The following article by Steve MacDonald has been republished with permission from GraniteGrok.
The data out of the UK continues to undermine the Covidiots, Covidism, and the experimental inoculation crowd. Three days ago, we reported that the vaccinated accounted for 94% of COVID deaths.
Today we’ve got more troubling news.
Children, who were never a vector but were lined up and jabbed anyway, are dying in record proportion to their unvaccinated peers.
If the UK numbers are accurate, they need to halt the vaccines for ages 10 to 14 immediately because it is raising ACM (all cause mortality) for kids by a factor of 45 (G12/G5).
In other words, the vaccines are the most dangerous intervention in human history for this age group. It makes COVID look like rounding error:
COVID: 5% ACM increase
COVID vaccine: 4400% ACM increase.
While a lot of data is coming out of the UK’s many offices, those who follow such things increasingly find it suspect. Garbage was the word used by Steve Kirsch, which he explains here. (One set of data suggested that The Jab lowered all-cause mortality in those 20-24), which no one believes). So we should be suspicious of reported outcomes where prudent. But it’s difficult to doubt all-cause mortality unless they are over-reporting deaths of children, and that’s not what you do if you are still trying to get a needle into every arm.
Maybe by making some data murky, you can dismiss real concerns, or is it the general incompetence of the bureaucracy? They are, after all, saying we need to jab kids with a pharmaceutical product when their case counts to hospitalization to death data contradict the need.
Not Just UK
Research in Israel indicates some tomfoolery in that nation as well. The Jab represents a significant risk for vaccine injury in children that rises exponentially as you jab younger kids.
In raw numbers, Berkowitz found that children in the 5-11 age group had twice as many adverse events following the Pfizer shot as children in the 12-17 age group. That doubling of vaccine injuries is, in itself, extremely disturbing and should have been immediately brought to the attention of the nation’s parents.
Unfortunately, the doubling of adverse events is only the beginning of the bad news. Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz, a health and risk communication researcher at the University of Haifa and at Reichman University (IDC Herzliya), notes that the 2-dose immunization rate for 5-11 year olds is less than 18%, while older children have rates of 55-72% (3-4 times higher).
All things being equal, the young children would thus be expected to have ⅓-¼ of the number of adverse events experienced by the older children, not twice as many. This means that the adverse event rate for young children is actually 6-8 times that of the older children, i.e., at 600-800% of the baseline injury rate!
So, they jab younger kids?
According to the report, toddlers and infants are also experiencing adverse events, but the government isn’t taking that as seriously as it should.
Here’s a response. Stop jabbing kids and not just because of the risk of vaccine harm.
Using New Hampshire as an example, the state reports nearly 90,000 positive cases of Chinese Flu in residents under the age of twenty since March 2020. Only 0.8% (46) of those were admitted or in the hospital with a positive test. Out of nearly 90,000 “cases,” there was one death, and we believe that child was vaccinated.
There is no demonstrable public health need or benefit, but there are adverse effects. That makes this a purely political program. That explains why they’d hide the harm, but why do politicians and public health bureaucrats want to harm children?