Will nationwide vaccine mandate trigger The Great Resignation?

By Thomas Catenacci

President Joe Biden’s wide-ranging vaccine mandate will affect tens of millions of U.S. workers, but experts, labor unions and business groups are divided on what impact the rule will have.

While experts disagree on whether the federal mandate, which applies to the majority of the U.S. workforce, may lead to mass resignations, the rule will at the very least disrupt workplaces nationwide, Erik Eisenmann, a partner at the national law firm Husch Blackwell, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Health Choice Vermont

Health professionals in Vermont carry signs to show they oppose mandatory coronavirus vaccines.

“I think one of the effects that you will see over the next month, as more and more businesses roll out mandates is that there’s going to be a shrinking population that are still objecting,” Eisenmann said in an interview. “I’m probably bearish on the idea that you’re going to have mass resignations that are going to be disruptive.”

“I think the primary disruption is going to be the employee relations issue in the meantime and how that’s going to affect workplace morale,” he continued.

On Sept. 9, Biden authorized the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to craft a rule requiring businesses with more than 100 employees to mandate workers to either get a COVID-19 vaccine or submit weekly tests proving they aren’t infected with the virus. It is unclear if the rule, which hasn’t yet been published, will include a requirement that employers pay for the weekly tests.

More than 80 million Americans, or over half of the U.S. working population, work for a business that has more than 100 employees, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Eisenmann, who primarily represents employers on labor and employment issues, added that Biden’s order may have the effect of helping businesses who wanted to issue a vaccine mandate, but didn’t, fearing workers would leave for a different job. Because of its breadth, the rule evens the playing field and limits the options for workers seeking to quit, he said.

‘Not acceptable’

Several labor unions, however, have forcefully condemned vaccine mandates, which they said stripped workers of their civil liberties. Many have warned of major consequences including potential mass resignations.

“Any staffing shortage, especially during a pandemic, is a threat to the health and safety of both students and personnel,” Mark Cannizzaro, president of New York City’s largest union representing school administrators and principals, said in a statement Thursday.

“It is dangerous and irresponsible for the city to move forward with its plan to allow schools and centers to operate so severely understaffed,” he continued. “As a result, we are calling on the city to delay the deadline for the mandate to allow the city to develop a reasonable contingency plan.”

In July, Mayor Bill de Blasio issued a vaccine mandate for all 400,000 public employees. Several unions quickly criticized the mandate and the New York Police Department’s largest union even threatened to sue.

“Mandates are not acceptable. People should have a choice,” New York City Fire Department Emergency Medical Service Union President Oren Barzilay told the DCNF. “There are still many unknowns about this vaccine. The government is simply doubling down so they don’t lose face with their agenda.”

Barzilay added that many members of his union were prepared to quit if there was no testing option to the New York City mandate.

A Massachusetts police union, meanwhile, said dozens of state troopers have already resigned over a vaccine mandate requiring all state employees to get vaccinated, NPR reported Monday. The mandate, imposed by Republican Gov. Charlie Baker last month, said state workers who refused vaccination would be fired.

In San Diego, roughly 45% of police officers said they would prefer to be fired than comply with a city mandate to receive a vaccine, according to a San Diego Police Officers Association internal survey, the ABC affiliate KGTV reported. The Portland police union said it opposed a vaccine mandate, citing potential resignations.

But the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), a federation of 55 unions and 12.5 million total members, applauded the national mandate announced by Biden.

“The resurgence of COVID-19 requires swift and immediate action, and we commend President Biden for taking additional steps to help put an end to this crisis,” AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler said in a statement on Sept. 10. “Everyone should be vaccinated—as one step in stopping the pandemic.”

Many labor unions nationwide have also reached agreements with officials on the terms for local mandates.

Others, like the American Postal Workers Union (APWU), wouldn’t speculate on the national mandate until they examined the published OSHA rule.

“As the APWU has continually stated, all employees are encouraged to wear face coverings at work and are encouraged to voluntarily receive one of the COVID-19 vaccines,” the APWU said in a statement.

The union wouldn’t speculate about mass resignations, but noted that the U.S. Postal Service has been hiring, which could offset any departures, APWU spokesperson Jamie Horowitz said in a brief phone interview.

‘A decision we applaud’

Like unions, business groups of varying sizes disagreed on the impact the vaccine mandate would have. While small business groups opposed the rule, big business rallied behind it.

“President Biden calls his plan a ‘path out of the pandemic’ but this mandate on business is a path to confusion, vastly higher costs, new liabilities, and general workplace chaos for businesses,” Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council President Karen Kerrigan said. “The restrictive one-size-fits all requirement will hamstring the flexibility business owners need – and are using – to adapt to the ever-changing nature of the pandemic and its variants.”

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), the leading small business group in the country, wrote a letter to Labor Secretary Marty Walsh slamming the mandate and arguing it is likely illegal. The group said that a mandate should be implemented by Congress, not the White House.

“NFIB recognizes the duty of governments to help protect the safety and health of the people, but NFIB also recognizes the duty of governments to help preserve the liberties of the people, even in difficult situations,” NFIB Senior Vice President and General Counsel David Addington wrote in the letter.

The Job Creators Network, another association of small businesses, characterized the mandate as an “onerous regulation” and implored the administration to reverse it. The group vowed to sue the Biden administration over the mandate.

However, the Business Roundtable, a large coalition of Fortune 500 executives, applauded Biden’s mandate. The group – which includes Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple CEO Tim Cook among others – said many of its members had already implemented the mandate.

“Business Roundtable welcomes the Biden Administration’s continued vigilance in the fight against COVID,” Business Roundtable President & CEO Joshua Bolten said in a statement. “America’s business leaders know how critical vaccination and testing are in defeating the pandemic, which is why so many have invested resources in encouraging and incentivizing their customers and employees to get vaccinated, including providing paid time off.”

“Over the past several weeks many companies have decided to implement a vaccine mandate for some or all of their employees, a decision we applaud,” Bolten continued.

The Chamber of Commerce, the largest business group in the U.S., said it would help its members follow the mandate.

“The Chamber will carefully review the details of the executive orders and associated regulations and will work to ensure that employers have the resources, guidance, and flexibility necessary to ensure the safety of their employees and customers and comply with public health requirements,” a U.S. Chamber spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation in a statement.

A 50-50 shot at surviving a legal challenge

Employers’ main concern moving forward is navigating the peculiarities of the mandate when it goes into effect, according to Eisenmann, the labor lawyer. He questioned if OSHA would have the means to ensure businesses thoroughly investigate all employee exemption requests, for example.

Businesses have already approached Eisenmann, saying workers are submitting religious exemption requests copied from online forums, he added.

“When the order gets issued, which I expect will occur in the next couple of weeks, I anticipate some lawsuits seeking injunctive relief to prevent it from going into effect,” Eisenmann told the DCNF.

“My best guess is that there’s probably about a 50% likelihood that that emergency temporary standard would survive a legal challenge and about 50% chance that it would be enjoined,” he continued. “OSHA would then have to go back to the drawing board.”

Arizona became the first state to sue the Biden administration over the mandate on Sept. 14, arguing the rule was unconstitutional since it favored illegal immigrants over American citizens. More than half of all states have threatened to sue once OSHA publishes the rule.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Image courtesy of Health Choice Vermont

6 thoughts on “Will nationwide vaccine mandate trigger The Great Resignation?

  1. Question:

    Is anyone thinking about he college loans that these professionals all have?
    There are a lot of these people that will say that their careers were just stolen from them by the government.. and I don’t think they are wrong.
    A lot of them might not find work.
    Many will then default on mortgages and colleges loans…
    We’ve seen this show before.
    Is anyone thinking of the ripples effects of all of this?

    And my last question:
    When did we all vote to be controlled by businesses and the medical establishment?
    Lets add Schools, Grocery Stores and darn near everything else we can think of.
    Does the Constitution not say that we are Free People?

  2. What was that famous song, “Take that jab and shove it” seems appropriate. The jab is an experimental gene therapy, not a vaccine. Any coercive mandate is unconstitutional. A job can be replayed. The country can not operate without employees. You can not replace your health if the jab causes severe problems or death. The employers do not have immunity from liability if you take the jab and suffer ill effects as a result of you being fired if un-jabbed per their policy. This is the lottery that you can’t win. This is the catch 22. This is like being lead to a railway car and being told that you will be going to a safer place. Use your head, do some research, spin the wheel. What you decide may harm you either way but there is only one way to freedom.

  3. This whole nationwide dispute may be a lot of hoopla about very little in the end. I just heard a report that United is starting to fire 600 employees for not getting the vax. This represents 1% of the workforce. Another 3% have formally requested an exemption. So 96% of their workforce is already vaccinated. What does this tell you ?

    To me, this means that the mandate is achieving it’s objective. It forces the majority of the unvaccinated to come to to grips with their reticence and finally get the jab that they were evidently going to get anyhow eventually.

    If 96% had just gone ahead and gotten the jab in the first place, we wouldn’t be discussing this. But of course, that whole idea was torpedoed by the Bidden-Haris team (and their lackey Cuomo) before the election when they claimed that they would be suspicious of ANY vaccine developed under the Trump administration. They laid the foundation for the fear of the “TRUMP VACCINE”. Sorry Dems, there is nowhere to hide. You own this mess.

    • You’re making an assumption that every single employer in the United States is requiring the vaccine. They’re not. Even Walmart does not require it. However if you don’t get the vaccine you have to wear a face mask.

      • Amy, you left out the part about mandatory weekly painful Covid-19 testing and the fact that study after study has proven that masks do nothing to stop the infection.

        In fact, it is those who have been jabbed (not a vaccine) are now more infectious than before and are the bases for new Delta variant infections.

        The people you see in stores now wearing masks are those who have been jabbed and they are afraid of the new Delta infection so where does this end?

        It ends when people finally stop living in fear and listening to CNN and the fraud Fauci. The only thing to stop this is natural immunity and this so called vaccine mania is preventing that from occurring.

    • The central issue isn’t whether the Covid vaccines are good for us or not. Many argue they’re necessary, but VAERS reports, whistleblower doctors and nurses, and many scientists argue that we’re seeing signs that these vaccines are dangerous and are actually driving new variants (example: Israel).

      The issue is forced vaccination, and when you threaten to take jobs from people that most certainly counts as “forcing.” This path leads nowhere we want to go, and you’d think that we’d have learned that lesson from eugenics, from court cases associated with vaccination and eugenics, and from how the trajectory of thinking that “the state can and must force medication on the population” ended up.

      We can argue that good has come from the state compelling medical measures in the sense of modest penalties for refusing to comply with those measures (such as occurred in the 1905 Jacobson decision: a $5 fine for refusing the smallpox vaccine during an epidemic) but there is no argument whatsoever that supports forced medical measures. “Oppressive” penalties were warned of in the Jacobson decision but ignored in subsequent legal decisions, pointing to the basic flaw in the Jacobson decision: determining that the state has any right to coerce medical measures. What counts as “coercion” is a slippery slope and we see it manifesting today, as in the comment that “It [Covid vaccine mandate] forces the majority of the unvaccinated to come to to grips with their reticence and finally get the jab that they were evidently going to get anyhow eventually.” No, it doesn’t force anyone to “come to grips”: it actually forces them to take a jab they’re opposed to and fearful of, and if they’re young and healthy, they’re absolutely correct: the risk from the vaccines could very well be greater than the risk from Covid-19.

      It’s unnecessary to vaccinate the entire population for Covid-19 but doing so exerts pressure on variants, such as delta, to emerge. Allowing natural immunity to develop in the population that isn’t at risk for serious Covid-19 (remember: many people were asymptomatic or had mild cases) creates immunity against all variants. By going down the path of mass vaccination we’re creating a situation of never-ending boosters and for reaching down lower and lower to vaccinate children against the monster that we ourselves are creating, and with vaccines that are potentially very dangerous for children. We simply don’t know, and no amount of industry-created, short-term safety studies would be convincing to critical thinkers.

      Isn’t it amazing how mean-spirited we’ve become that we want to destroy the livelihoods of people for not complying with a medical police state, when their own decisions are perfectly rational, both for themselves and for society as a whole?

Comments are closed.