Ninth proposed amendment to Vermont Constitution this biennium would protect, conserve clean air and water

By Guy Page and Mary Daly

A bill introduced into the Vermont Senate last week would amend the Vermont Constitution to establish clean air and water and state conservation as a protected right.

PR9 would enshrine in the Vermont Constitution the “right to clean air and water and the preservation of the natural, scenic, and cultural values of the environment. The State of Vermont’s natural resources are the common property of all the people. The State shall conserve and maintain the natural resources of Vermont for the benefit of all people.”

PR9 is sponsored by Sen. Chris Bray (D-Addison) and co-sponsored by Sens. Rebecca Balint, Philip Baruth, Brian Campion, Alison Clarkson, Ruth Hardy, Cheryl Hooker, Deborah Ingram, Virginia Lyons, Richard McCormack, Corey Parent, Christopher Pearson, Andrew Perchlik, Anthony Pollina and John Rodgers. It was introduced Feb. 14 and referred to the committee Bray chairs, Natural Resources and Energy.

Guy Page

As with all constitutional amendments, the interpretation and application of PR9 would ultimately be decided by the Legislature’s other two co-equal branches of government, the executive and the judicial. The executive could initiate action (new programs and regulations) based on the newly-established right of preservation and conservation, and the courts would decide if asked whether the action passes constitutional muster. Would PR9 further protect natural resources against development? Would the “common property” phrase be understood to further limit private ownership? Questions such as these will be asked if Senate Natural Resources chooses to pursue the bill.

In the 2019-20 biennium, nine proposed Amendments to the Vermont Constitution have been introduced. As a result, Election Day voters on November 3, 2022 may be asked to ratify at least two constitutional amendments, one controversial (unrestricted right to reproductive freedom, including abortion) and one not (elimination of any form of slavery).

The Vermont Constitution requires that any proposed amendment begin in the Senate, with approval requiring a ‘yes’ vote by two-thirds of the Senate.  The State House of Representatives must then concur by a majority of votes. The proposed amendment is then referred to the next biennial session of the General Assembly for approval. Amendments approved by the two successive General Assemblies then face one final hurdle: statewide voter ratification on Election Day, November 3, 2022. If voters say yes, the amendment is adopted.

In addition to PR9, the following amendments have been introduced in 2019-20:

Proposed Amendment #1 (PR.1”), introduced by a tri-partisan group of 10 senators Jan. 17, 2019, would provide the Governor with a four-year term of office, beginning in the year 2024; and would also amend Chapter II, Section 43 of the Vermont Constitution to clarify that Assistant Judges, Sheriffs, States Attorneys, and Judges of Probate—who already have a four-year term of office—are elected every four years.  No further action has been recorded.

PR.2, introduced Jan. 23, 2019 and co-sponsored by 27 senators, would clarify that slavery and indentured servitude are prohibited. Last month, the House concurred.  

PR. 3, introduced Jan. 17, 2019 by Sens. Joe Benning (R-Caledonia) and Dick McCormack (D-Windsor), would provide that each individual has a right to privacy, including the 10 right to keep personal information private; to communicate with others privately; and to make decisions concerning his or her body. No further action has been recorded. Sen. Benning said this proposal is unlikely to proceed this biennium.

PR.4, introduced Feb. 17, 2019 and co-sponsored by 27 senators, would ensure that every Vermonter enjoys equal treatment and respect under the law. This amendment is in keeping with the values espoused by the current Vermont Constitution. Chapter I, Article 1 declares “That all persons are born equally free and independent, and have certain natural, inherent, and unalienable rights.” In particular PR.4 would enshrine equal rights for historically marginalized groups of people: “The State shall not deny equal treatment and respect under the law on account of a person’s race, ethnicity, sex, religion, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.” No further action has been recorded.

PR.5, introduced Feb. 12, 2019 by Sens. Tim Ashe (D/P – Chittenden, Becca Balint (D-Windham), Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden), and Richard Sears (D-Bennington), would ensure that every Vermonter is afforded personal reproductive liberty. Although the word “abortion” does not appear, PR.5 was understood in testimony in both House and Senate as protecting the unrestricted right to an abortion up to the moment of birth. The Statement of Purpose says, “Enshrining this right in the Constitution is critical to ensuring equal protection and treatment under the law and upholding the right of all people to health, dignity, independence, and freedom.” The House concurred with the amendment last May.

A November, 2019 Vermont Water Cooler poll showed 19% of Vermonters oppose any legal abortion, 29% support unrestricted abortion, and the rest favor legalization with some restrictions.

PR.6, introduced Feb. 14, 2019 by Sen. Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) and Robert Starr (R/D – Orleans/Essex), would provide Vermont state senators with a four-year term of office, beginning in 2024. It also clarifies four-year terms of office for Assistant Judges, Sheriffs, States Attorneys, and Judges of Probate. No further action recorded.

PR.7, introduced Jan. 7, 2020 by Sen. Sears, would allow a court to hold a person accused of a violent misdemeanor or violent felony without bail when the evidence of guilt is great, the court finds that the person’s release poses a substantial threat of physical violence to any person, and that no conditions of release will reasonably prevent the violence. No further action recorded.

PR.8, introduced Jan. 10, 2020 by Sens. Deb Ingram (D-Chittenden), Ruth Hardy (D-Addison), and Lyons, would use gender-neutral terminology to refer to voters. For example, a subchapter entitled “Qualifications of Freemen and Freewomen” would be changed to “Voter Qualifications.” No further action recorded.

PR.8 is a follow-up to the last constitutional amendment, adopted in 1994. In 1991 and again in 1993, the Vermont General Assembly approved a constitutional amendment authorizing the justices of the Vermont Supreme Court to revise the Constitution in “gender-inclusive” language, replacing gender-specific terms. (Examples: “men” and “women” were replaced by “persons” and the “Freeman’s Oath,” required of all newly registered voters in the state, was renamed the “Voters’ Oath“). The revision was ratified by the voters in the general election of November 8, 1994.

Read more of Guy Page’s reports.

Image courtesy of TNR
Spread the love

8 thoughts on “Ninth proposed amendment to Vermont Constitution this biennium would protect, conserve clean air and water

  1. Seems to me that PR9 would turn over ALL of Vermont’s natural resources to the State. What a perfect way to enact a climate change agenda “for the common good”.

    • Private property is so passe, it’s not on the “agenda”…..inconvenient for those bent on complete control and power….what’s your’s is mine saith the government is soooo much better.

  2. it was never about getting into the constitution to change wording for racism.

    Here my friend we are getting closer to the truth. PR9 is about Vermont becoming a socialist state, believe me now? Yeah…we control everything.

    The conversation is NOT republicans against democrats, that is how the socialists have and want the argument to be. They want Republicans to keep all people who vote democrat in the same pool, so they can hide and change our state under the cover of the democratic party. Meanwhile republicans offend those American loving democrats in the Vermont democratic party, forever keeping us apart.

    We had better wake up soon! We keep falling for their conversation and framing EVERYTIME, EVERYEAR and we lose massively because of it.

    About time we embrace our American loving democratic neighbors and leave the socialists at the curb, they are only good at carrying water for the United Nations. If we don’t give them a safe, friendly place to hang out, we’ll lose again, while the socialists laugh all the way to changing our constitution.

    Know your enemy. Sun Tzu…. I’ll add, know your true enemy.

  3. I’d like to see a law in affect that if a lawmaker introduces and passes any law that’s harmful to the citizenry given as per the US and State Constitutions, they be held personally liable to prosecution and civil lawsuits by an individual or class action.

    There has to be controls. The people so employed under the dome are not answerable to the people as has been demonstrated / known for many years since the Socialists have come to power in the past 30-40 years. They have ruined the state.

    I propose another state Constitutional Amendment. And to include to limit the length of sessions to 2 months per year. Power back to the people. No more 1200 introduced bills a year thereby making a job / work.

  4. Again, we see a barrage of feel-good legislation, when are these officials that were
    elected to do work of the people, and not an agenda.

    The state with its aggressive tax structure, bottomless unfunded liabilities in the tune
    of $4.5 billion, drug issues and this list to amend the constitution, why they can’t handle
    what we have………….

    If these clowns worked ” Real Work ” for any other business and this was their performance
    they would all be fired ………

    Wake up people its time to eliminate these slackers in the statehouse !!.

  5. :PR.2, introduced Jan. 23, 2019 and co-sponsored by 27 senators, would clarify that slavery and indentured servitude are prohibited. Last month, the House concurred.”

    Isn’t this the result of the Dome’s clowns passing all those controlling laws and high taxes that make the people that don’t move out, slaves to them? That’s Agenda 21, control the masses. Make people poor so they become dependent on the Government.

  6. Why do we pay for these imbeciles to waste time and pollute our state constitution
    with PC naming and unneeded duplication of existing law???

    Shorten the legislative session to 1 week preparatory and 1 week voting then send them
    home.. after they cut 1 state gov office every year…

Comments are closed.