Benjamin Tardif and John Schoof | The Daily Signal
“I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.” Those were the famous words of Terry McAuliffe’s failed gubernatorial campaign in Virginia last fall.
The past two years of the COVID-19 pandemic exposed just how little control parents have over their children’s public school education. And their powerlessness did not end when many schools finally reopened their doors over a year into the pandemic. Parents across the nation still find themselves unable to access the materials used in their kids’ public school curricula.
The deep chasm between the agendas of school board members and the interests of parents and their children has been exposed, and many parents are beginning to feel they must join the school boards themselves to make any real change in their children’s education.
And that’s exactly what they’re doing. Parents with no experience working in the education system are running for and winning school board seats.
One such parent is Koleen Crawford of Londonderry, New Hampshire. Recognizing that remote learning during the pandemic resulted in significant learning loss for children, she laid out her reasons for running for a school board seat, stating, “I’m hoping to help bridge that gap to get our kids back to where they need to be academically.”
Texas resident Scott Henry had never run for any sort of political office and had no political aspirations of any kind. In an interview with the Washington Examiner, Henry cited “the lack of transparency and accountability in our board” as the catalyst for his decision to run.
In addition to running for open seats, parents are attempting to recall school board members in record numbers. Even in leftist San Francisco, voters successfully recalled three incumbent school board members earlier this year after residents became frustrated with the board’s priorities: renaming 44 schools and watering down the admissions process at one of its best high schools, all while running a $125 million deficit and keeping schools closed.
However, not all recall efforts have been successful—though the efforts themselves still send a powerful message.
New research from Michael Hartney of Boston College confirms and strengthens earlier findings that teachers unions “remain a potent force” in school board elections. In other work, Hartney says, “The important reality is that thousands of school board members will be ‘elected’ by tiny and unrepresentative electorates prior to next November’s general election.”
Teachers unions lobby school districts to hold elections off-cycle, that is, not at the same time as national elections. With many elections occurring in the spring or during odd years, most citizens who aren’t union members aren’t paying close attention and thus don’t show up to vote.
As Sarah Anzia of the University of California, Berkeley, points out, “Members of interest groups with a large stake in an election outcome turn out at high rates regardless of election timing, and their efforts to mobilize and persuade voters have a greater impact when turnout is low.”
Earlier research by Anzia confirms that not only do off-cycle elections decrease voter turnout, but they also lead to policy outcomes more favored by teachers unions.
This issue is widespread. Hartney’s new research shows that “union favored candidates tend to win in both strong and weak union states and in conservative and liberal school districts.” In our own data collection at The Heritage Foundation, we counted only 15 states and the District of Columbia where all districts hold regular school board elections in November of even years—in other words, during regular election cycles where turnout is higher.
Given the current system, concerned parents are unlikely to consistently win elections for school boards with such a political process structured toward protecting existing organized interests.
To counter this, policymakers should empower parents to educate their children in accordance with their preferences and values through legislation that allows for the creation of education savings accounts.
Education savings accounts provide parents with the option of removing their student from a public school and getting a portion of the taxpayer money that would normally fund their child’s public school education to use for private school, homeschooling, or other educational arrangement. Lawmakers in 10 states have made accounts available to K-12 students and their families.
Whether it be private school, online curriculum, or private tutoring, the key component is that the people who know the student best are making the choices, not a teachers union or government bureaucrat. Parents have every right to be in control of their child’s education. It’s time for our education system to reflect that.
3 thoughts on “Political deck stacked against parents running for school boards”
It’s not just the Vermont School Board Association that’s problematic. As a former school board director, I learned quickly that most board members have conflicts of interest – some blatant. Last year, for example, at my district’s high school, one board member was the spouse of the school’s guidance counselor, until several complaints caused the board member not to run again. But often, board members are retired teachers from the same district they manage. Sometimes board members are active teachers in an adjacent school district. Others are social workers and attorneys specializing in Special Education advocacy. And others are related to these people. They are organized. They know how to run for office and get elected. They represent all of the public-school special interest groups stalking their prey at the great public school monopoly watering hole. In other words, the game is rigged.
And why should a parent have to run for school board in the first place, just to be sure their children aren’t being indoctrinated? Why should they risk teacher retaliation against their children when they rule against teacher interests regarding pay and benefits, or curriculum? Do active parents have any more right to impose their views on others in the community? Isn’t that the problem, no matter on what side of the political aisle one is on?
It’s the education system that’s busted. Not the people in it. The system forces a tyranny of the majority, and student performance reflects it. Half of Vermont’s public-school students graduate without having achieved minimal grade level academic standards. Never mind the ‘woke’ vs. ‘conservative’ ideologies. Dysfunction is built in, and the cost per student reflects it. In my district we spend almost as much to teach a 1st grader as it costs to send an in-state student to Castleton University for a full year course load PLUS room and board.
Micromanaging in a public-school board format is a fool’s errand. Let schools manage themselves. Let them choose what and how they teach, and how much they charge for the service. And, most importantly, let parents use Vermont’s ‘tuition’ voucher to choose the school they believe best meets the needs of their children. Take politics out of the education equation altogether.
The alternative is, of course, that conservative parents bite the bullet, spend precious time and resources to get organized. Run for school board. Assert their own criteria in the public schools, and force ‘woke’ teachers and parents to follow their wishes. Give them a taste of their own medicine. Surely, after being forced to sit at the back of their own bus, the ‘woke’ community will be the ones clamoring for School Choice. Maybe then the community, as a whole, will realize just how busted the public education monopoly really is.
As someone recently elected to a local board, i can say, without a doubt the vermont school board association is the biggest problem in our local schools. There is no alternative and there is lots of pressure to conform to their preached partisan wokeness. Its essentially a union for school board members that drastically dictates curriculum direction as well as legislation in our state. This MUST be defeated!
Comments are closed.