Not all states shutting down economies to fight virus

While Vermont is with the majority of states that have chosen to shut down restaurants, bars and close-contact businesses statewide in response to the coronavirus, some states and governors have gone in a different direction.

Mississippi and Nebraska are just two examples of several states that are issuing restrictions on more of a community-to-community basis.

In Mississippi, Gov. Tate Reeves is letting individual communities make their own call when it comes to economic restrictions.

“We don’t want to make any decisions that will ultimately do more harm than good,” Reeves said during a Facebook question/answer session last week.

Reeves has taken flak for not issuing statewide restrictions. One of his critics, Mississippi state Rep. Jarvis Dortch, D-Jackson, took to Twitter to voice his concerns.

Bruce Parker/TNR

Many states have taken a statewide approach to managing the spread of the coronavirus, shutting down everything from businesses and hotels to parks and shelters.

“Mayors and local leaders are putting in place differing curfews and orders,” he wrote. “This patchwork system is creating public confusion that will result in panic.”

One of Reeves’ supporters is Gulfport Mayor Billy Hewes.

“We talked along with about 20 other mayors on a conference call. He was very empathetic to the mayors concerns,” Hewes said. “He’s willing to listen to us and knows a one size fits all approach might not be the best way to deal with this.”

Mississippi has reported 758 cases of Coronavirus and 13 deaths as of Sunday.

At the federal level, President Donald Trump thinks Americans can both revive the economy and  protect those most vulnerable to illness.

“It’s a very bad situation, we haven’t seen anything like it, but the end result is we got to get back to work, and I think we can start by opening up certain parts of the country, you know, the farm belt, certain parts of the Midwest, other places,” Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity.

Vermont Gov. Phill Scott, however, has indicated that the state’s economy will stay shut down for many months.

“This is going to be for a long period of time — months I think, before we are even through the initial surge,” Scott said recently.

Yet In Nebraska, Gov. Pete Ricketts is issuing his orders on a county-by-county basis. As of Sunday, the state has 10 counties including over 100,000 people that have been restricted to gatherings of 10 persons or fewer, effectively closing restaurants, bars, churches, theaters, schools, and gyms.

Ricketts explained in a CNN interview that he appreciates the president letting states pick their own course of action.

“I think what one of the other things the president said is that this is not a one-size-fits-all answer,” he said. ” … We’ve got a plan and we’re going to continue to work the plan, it involves breaking our state up regionally by public health districts and how many cases we have in those districts and putting our restrictions in place.”

Nebraska, as of Sunday, has 108 reported cases of the Coronavirus and two deaths.

A handful of other states have taken a similar strategy to Nebraska and Mississippi. Kansas has allowed bars and restaurants to remain open, though individual communities are allowed to take stricter measures. Similar community-to-community approaches have been taken in Idaho, Missouri, Montana and South Dakota.

In Vermont, 133 of the state’s 256 coronavirus cases have been located in Chittenden County. Addison County has the next highest number of cases, with 21. Despite the concentration in a single county, Scott has issued statewide orders, causing jobless claims to spike 2,143% in a single week, from 659 total claims in the prior week to 14,784.

By comparison, Mississippi is only reporting a 486% increase in unemployment applications. Nebraska saw a 1,800% rise and Kansas saw a 1,200% increase in claims.

Nations that been in economic suppression for weeks are now starting to see social unrest. For example, Italy is beginning to experience looting and riots in response to the country’s clampdown on citizens.

As of Monday, Vermont has 256 positive cases of COVID-19 and 12 deaths from the virus.

By comparison, over the three-week period ending March 14, Vermont has had 23 pneumonia deaths and five influenza deaths, according to the National Center for Health Statistics Mortality Surveillance System.

Michael Bielawski is a reporter for True North. Send him news tips at bielawski82@yahoo.com and follow him on Twitter @TrueNorthMikeB.

Images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Tony Webster and Bruce Parker/TNR
Spread the love

3 thoughts on “Not all states shutting down economies to fight virus

  1. I feel our state would do better with a plan like that of Gov. Ricketts of Nebraska . Each county can decide for themselves. I see nothing wrong at this point with loosening the reins a bit. Essentially what Gov. Scott and many others government leaders in our country are doing, is giving preferential treatment to one sect of society. Many lives are at stake, not just those with compromised immune systems. We all have been drilled about hygiene safety and should continue these commonsense procedures. Individuals can and should be taking on responsibility for their own health and the health of their loved ones that they come into contact with on a daily basis. To continue this shut down is dangerous and detrimental to Vermont and all of America. Here is a quote directly from the CDC “Most people who get sick with COVID-19 will have only mild illness and should recover at home.*”. Note the word mild.

    • All those who are in favor of authoritarian government – especially one that violates constitutional authorities – belong in Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Red China, or Iran. Vermont should be populated with those who share the heart of the Green Mountain Boys.

Comments are closed.