Los Angeles County begins to clean up voter rolls after lawsuit, setting precedent for other jurisdictions

By Fred Lucas | The Daily Signal

President Donald Trump cited a Los Angeles County legal settlement as evidence of improper voting in California, as the state’s largest jurisdiction moves to clean up its voter rolls.

Los Angeles County began sending notices to inactive voters as part of a settlement of a 2017 federal lawsuit with watchdog groups and county residents who had sued over voters on the rolls who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible.

The county will send as many as 1.5 million notices to voters who haven’t cast ballots in the past two federal elections, according to Judicial Watch, one of the litigants, which was notified of the plans last week.

Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton: “This victory for clean elections in California will set another national precedent for other states to take reasonable steps to ensure that dead and other ineligible voters are removed from the rolls.”

Voters who don’t respond to the county notices and who then don’t vote in the next two federal elections will be removed from the voter rolls, after 2022. Federal elections, which draw the largest turnouts, occur every two years.

Thus, a person would essentially have to be an inactive voter for at least eight years—two election cycles before the notice and two cycles after—before becoming ineligible.

In a “Meet the Press” interview aired on NBC on Sunday, host Chuck Todd asked Trump if he was still bothered by not winning the popular vote in 2016.

“I’ll say something that, again, is controversial. There were a lot of votes cast that I don’t believe. I look at California,” Trump told Todd.

Todd interrupted several times before Trump returned to his point.

“Take a look at Judicial Watch. Take a look at their settlement, where California admitted to a million votes,” Trump said. “They [California] admitted to a million votes.”

Todd appeared unaware of the settlement, agreed to in January. “A million votes of what? What are you talking about?”

Trump responded, “Judicial Watch made a settlement. … There was much illegal voting.”

The settlement was not an admission that 1 million votes were illegally cast, but the litigation asserted that 1 in 5 registered voters in Los Angeles County are ineligible and that the county took no action to remove them from voter lists or check their status.

With about 10 million residents, the county has a larger population than 41 of the 50 states. Moreover, the state of California has not cleaned up its voting rolls for 20 years, according to Judicial Watch.

“This Judicial Watch settlement will result in the immediate and ongoing clean-up of voter rolls in California and L.A. County,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “This victory for clean elections in California will set another national precedent for other states to take reasonable steps to ensure that dead and other ineligible voters are removed from the rolls.”

The county notices are listed in the settlement agreement, and list three options for a registered voter to check: “The person named on this card no longer lives at this address” or “The address information listed above is correct. Please sign below and return this card” or “The address information above is wrong. Please provide the correction information below.”

In the 2017 case of Judicial Watch v. Dean C. Logan, the conservative watchdog group sued on behalf of Wolfgang Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County. The Election Integrity Project California Inc., a public-interest group that monitors polling and voter rolls, was also a party to the litigation.

The settlement was reached in January, but Los Angeles County notified the plaintiffs it has begun the process of cleaning the rolls just last week.

The media relations office of the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean Logan did not respond to phone and email inquiries from The Daily Signal as of publication time, despite an email Friday saying, “We’ll respond [as soon as possible].”

The Daily Signal followed up with an inquiry on Monday.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla alerted other counties to clean up their voter registration lists to comply with the 25-year-old federal National Voter Registration Act, better known as the “motor voter law.” Padilla is also updating the National Voter Registration Act manual in order to clarify that ineligible names must be removed.

Padilla’s office notified Judicial Watch on April 11 that that aspect of the settlement had been implemented, but his office said its recent actions were not a result of the settlement.

“Judicial Watch is once again deliberately distorting this settlement to undermine voter confidence in democracy,” Padilla’s press secretary, Sam Mahood, told The Daily Signal in an email.

“The settlement was clear and simple. California will continue its work to adhere to modern list-maintenance procedures under the National Voter Registration Act,” Mahood said. “Updating the NVRA manual and providing guidance and training to county elections officials on voter-list maintenance is a regular practice for the Secretary of State’s office, which was already in progress prior to the settlement.”

Images courtesy of Public domain and Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

4 thoughts on “Los Angeles County begins to clean up voter rolls after lawsuit, setting precedent for other jurisdictions

  1. The names targeted have not voted since before 2016 and probably will not vote in the future. So this program will, at best, have negligible effect on future election results. Even so, voter registration lists should be properly maintained because of potential fraud.

    The larger problem, which originated in California in the ’90’s and has spread from there, is the fraudulent absentee ballot mass produced by the Democratic Party. These names appear as active voters and will not be part of a cleanup. And this problem will be compounded by the cleanup project (remember who’s in control of it). We will find the non-voters who don’t return the notice suddenly voting again with an absentee ballot in 2020.

  2. Be interested to see what would happen in Vermont if it cleaned up its voter lists.Would folks still in jail continue to vote? What about nonresidents voting, particularly college students who votte in their home states as well as in Vermont? How about illegals who register to vote when they get driver’s licenses? The list goes on and on.

    • Bernie was the one who started this went to UVM to register out of town student to vote for him for Mayor.
      Now we Register illegals who are allowed drivers licences.
      Taking dead people off the rolls because they have not voted seems to do nothing. If the illegals or out of towners vote as the absent or deceased voter – then the fraud goes on.
      “workers” go to polls to study the voter lists to find names not yet voted, then the buss pulls up and they hand out names to democrat/socialist voters – then on to the next precinct, and vote again.

  3. While I laud Los Angeles County in taking action to remove inactive voters, removing them has no effect on illegal voting. They aren’t voting at all.

Comments are closed.