Cost and performance of electric vehicles still uncertain as state electrifies its fleet

MONTPELIER — The state of Vermont is changing its fleet over to electric vehicles and hybrids, but little is known about how much it will cost taxpayers, or how the vehicles will perform in New England’s cold climate.

On Wednesday, Harmony Wilder and Chris Cole, respectively the fleet manager and commissioner of the Department of Buildings and General Services, appeared before the Senate Transportation Committee to report how the adoption of new state vehicles is progressing.

The fleet’s transformation is a mandate in the FY 2020 transportation bill, which requires that at least 50 percent of vehicles purchased or leased by the department must be plug-in electric (EV) or gas-electric hybrids. Beginning July 1, 2021, the quota for electrification of the fleet rises to 75 percent.

Michael Bielawski/TNR

MORE STATE EVs: From left to right, Harmony Wilder and Chris Cole, respectively the fleet manager and commissioner of the Department of Buildings and General Services, discuss electrification of the state fleet with members of the Senate Committee on Transportation.

Wilder told senators the BGS Fleet Management Services has purchased and accepted delivery of 17 non-hybrid vehicles and 40 hybrid vehicles in fiscal year 2020. This order breaks down as 30 percent non-hybrid (conventional gas/diesel) and 70 percent hybrid or electric.

For the remaining four months of this fiscal year, the department anticipates ordering another 42 non-hybrid vehicles, 69 hybrids and 10 full-electric vehicles. This amounts to 35 percent non-hybrid and 65 percent hybrid/EV. If the orders go as planned, the total purchases for FY 2020 would break down as 33 percent non-hybrid and 66 percent hybrid/EV.

Wilder said replacements increasingly will be electric or hybrids.

“Pretty much we’re sticking with if there is a hybrid or EV model available, that is what you get,” she said.

Some of the larger EV models are still too expensive for adoption.

“There is a minivan — however the price is astronomical,” Wilder said. “We think we can make our targets well above and exceed our targets without having to include the minivans yet. The Dodge 1500 has a mild hybrid and we’re looking into those as well.”

Sen. Tim Ashe, D/P-Chittenden and vice chair of the committee, a hybrid owner himself, told True North that the law allows some leeway when it comes to adopting larger vehicles.

“It provided flexibility to the agencies and to the commissioner of Buildings and General Services, knowing that for some activities, if they need a pick-up truck and there’s not a hybrid or electric model, you can’t force that issue,” he said.

All EV models continue to rely on federal and state subsidies. The federal government provides a tax credit of up to $7,500 for new EV purchases. Vermont is chipping in $1.1 million from its budget to help subsidize the electric vehicles.

Despite these subsidies, the retail price for most EVs still ranges from $30,000 and up. Some high-end models are over six figures.

Sen. Dick Mazza, D-Grand Isle, the chair of the committee, told True North the total cost impact of this transition for taxpayers is still being assessed. For now, there are no hard figures.

“We want to make sure that it’s cost-effective, but more importantly we want to protect the environment and try to switch as many as we can,” he said.

Sen. James McNeil, R-Rutland, the only Republican on the committee, said he’s confident the state will reap financial benefits from EV adoption.

“It’s definitely saving on gas and emissions,” he told True North.

Cole and Wilder said details of those savings won’t be available until the vehicles are out on the road.

“We won’t know until we start actually having them in the fleet and we can track their fuel economy,” Wilder said.

Cole echoed that sentiment.

“We’ll know better a year from now the total operational costs, including purchase-cost and the costs to operate it for a year,” he said.

EV performance, especially in the cold Vermont climate, continues to be a concern. Cole, who drives a hybrid, told committee members his model relies more on the battery and less on gas than some other models. He said the cold temperatures have not been good for the battery and the vehicle’s range.

“I’m getting less in the winter — a full-third less capacity,” he said. ” … So I asked them about all the other vehicles that they sold and they said, ‘Yeah, we have a bunch of dissatisfied customers.'”

Cole also noted that charging stations are not always an easy find for EV drivers, which is why hybrids continue to sell better than full electric vehicles.

“This is potentially why we are seeing more hybrid vehicles than plug-in hybrid vehicles, because if you don’t have a place to plug it in at work and keep your fleet vehicle going, you are not going to purchase it,” he said.

EVs continue to experience strong opposition in the political landscape, especially from conservatives. On Wednesday, gubernatorial candidate John Klar penned an op-ed for the American Thinker that pointed out how electric cars rely on carbon-based energy.

“Even if they focus on forcing electrification of private cars, where does the real power come from every night when most of them plug in to re-charge?” he wrote. “If it is a still night, zero electricity will be coming from wind and solar. That leaves coal, gas, batteries, pumped-hydro, rationing, load-shedding or blackouts to close the gap.”

Michael Bielawski is a reporter for True North. Send him news tips at bielawski82@yahoo.com and follow him on Twitter @TrueNorthMikeB.

Image courtesy of Michael Bielawski/TNR
Spread the love

15 thoughts on “Cost and performance of electric vehicles still uncertain as state electrifies its fleet

  1. Thanks to all of you that have written excellent comments, so I won’t repeat, but rest assured that I am beyond furious! Two main points- purchasing ALL of those vehicles, and I totally agree with John Klar. Electricity doesn’t just fall from the sky, and it is damn expensive!

  2. The state is just wasting money on Ashe’s ego trip projects that do not make sense for 90% of Vermonters.

    DO NOT FORCE US TO DRIVE EVS THAT ARE UNSUITABLE FOR VERMONTERS, OR WE VOTE YOU OUT.

  3. The state is just wasting money on Ashe’s ego trip projects that do not make sense for 90% of Vermonters.

    DO NOT FORCE US TO DRIVE EVS THAT ARE UNSUITABLE FOR VERMONTERS, OR WE VOTE YOU OUT

    • Vermont has already gone to hell in a handbasket! Too late! House going on the market! Fly over states here we come! Lib asshats enjoy your utopia!

  4. Heavily investing in costly (to taxpayers) products of a rapidly evolving technology results in state ownership of a fleet of soon-to-be obsolete vehicles that add stress to an energy supply they are also crippling through legislated investment in economically non competitive unreliable power sources. Are they mad? Is this a political religion of collectivist masochistic penitents? There are proven reliable and affordable products available for their municipal transportation requirements – for which infrastructure already exists. Small scale investment in new technology in search of greater efficiency, lower cost is rational. Electrical vehicles for use in urban environments may prove cost effective, but large scale investment when there’s a readily available existing cost competitive alternative?

  5. We just need to convince Pres Trump to withhold all fed subsidies on e cars until VT conforms to fed law on illegals.. they’ll never comply and won’t be able to afford them without subsidy.. good for taxpayers bad for warmongering agenda leftowhacks….

  6. Typical Liberal Legislation, just jump off the cliff it shouldn’t be a problem !!

    Another boondoggle because it’s a trend, react before knowing all the facts,
    oh well, it’s only taxpayer money… we can always get more if there’s a problem.

    Wake up, people…….

  7. To the do good legislators, it does not matter what we the end consumer is stuck with. They have accomplished a part of their goal, which has nothing to do with carbon, it is control of our lives. They cannot control the oil companies so this is a way to get around that hurdle. They control the power, the charging locations, the fact that cold weather hits Vermont, well just get out that bike and peddle yourself around.
    This is the way they think, guys and gals, when are we going to stop this non sense and put it to bed for good? We can start in Nov of this year, or we can endure nonsense until hell freezes over. I know how I am voting.

  8. If the progs want people in the rurals to move into compact centers and work within their townships, walk or bicycle to work, maybe they should expect the same of all state employees, including the governor and legislators.
    Why wouldn’t they buy a couple of EV’s and hybrids first and test them in the winter to see just how they perform. I wouldn’t be surprised if they asked several manufacturers, they could get some loaners for test evaluations.
    It’s very easy to go out and buy a bunch of stuff when it’s not your money. And with the VT legislature, increasing the state’s debt doesn’t matter because we working citizens must have deep pockets.

  9. Typical of the do gooder folks in Montpelier, jump in and we’ll deal with unintended consequences later and let the tax payers fund the clean up. Nothing new here.

  10. Usually prudent people check the cost of ownership before buying, not after. These numbers are known for many things

    • Indeed.

      Again, consider Article 9 of VT’s Constitution:

      “…previous to any law being made to raise a tax, the purpose for which it is to be raised ought to appear evident to the Legislature to be of more service to community than the money would be if not collected.”

      Perhaps the funding mechanisms (the taxes raised) paying these costs should be challenged as being unconstitutional.

  11. Just buy them some bicycles and be done with it. Horses and buggies are proven and time-tested technologies too.
    All this high-tech stuff is a fraud. The energy has to come from somewhere.
    Probably the best bet is to have government employees walk, or just stay at home, and have their paychecks mailed to them.

    • Re: “Probably the best bet is to have government employees walk, or just stay at home, and have their paychecks mailed to them.”

      The best bet is to have fewer government employees.

Comments are closed.