Beth Pearce sides against ‘anti-ESG’ laws, defends left-wing corporate culture

Vermont State Treasurer Beth Pearce has signed her name to a letter along with 11 other state treasurers opposing legislation intended to discourage business dealings with companies that engage in environmental, social and governance (ESG) training of their employees.

According to investopedia.com, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing “refers to a set of standards for a company’s behavior used by socially conscious investors to screen potential investments.”

Vote for Vermont/Pat McDonald

Vermont Treasurer Beth Pearce

Critics say ESG training is liberal indoctrination of the workforce, as well as an offense to investors who may disagree with companies becoming political or “going woke.” The backlash against ESG training and policies has manifested in the form of legislation in conservative states that aims to prohibit state business dealings with companies that engage in ESG policies.

Pearce is siding against these so-called anti-ESG policies. She says it is in a state’s best economic interest to invest freely in the interest of benefiting taxpayers.

“Several states in our country have started blacklisting financial firms that don’t agree with their political views,” the letter from the treasurers reads. “West Virginia, Idaho, Oklahoma, Texas, and Florida have created new policies and laws that restrict who they will do business with, reducing competition and restricting access to many high-quality managers. This strategy has real costs that ultimately impact their taxpayers.”

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida is one leader who has supported avoiding companies that engage in ESG policies.

“Corporate power has increasingly been utilized to impose an ideological agenda on the American people through the perversion of financial investment priorities under the euphemistic banners of environmental, social, and corporate governance and diversity, inclusion, and equity,” DeSantis said in a statement.

But Pearce and the other treasurers support liberal ESG policies, including left-wing views on the environment and social issues. The letter states those who oppose ESG are opposed to “progress made by those of us who believe in collaboration and engagement.” The treasurers argue corporations should be making policies around climate.

“Organizations that recognize the threat of climate change are already working toward reducing their carbon footprint, while the automobile manufacturers have begun rapid movement to electric vehicles,” their letter says.

According to ESGEnterprise.com, companies that wade into political areas can gain financial opportunities not available to those that forego ESG.

“Environmental, social, and governance are the criteria established for assessing the sustainability of investments in the light of the ever-dynamic climate change. ESG investing involves a consideration of ESG factors. Over 40% of investors currently apply ESG investing, as passive or active investors,” the website states.

In 2016, however, Pearce argued against divestment of the state’s pension retirement funds that were in part invested in fossil fuel companies.

“From our end, legislating investments is bad practice,” she wrote in 2016. “… My first priority is to protect the 49,000 active, vested and retired members of the system, the beneficiaries, and the taxpayers who put dollars into that system. For me, I don’t think [divestment from carbon-based fuels] is the best approach.”

Six years later Pearce and other state treasurers are advocating that corporate policies be guided by political concerns about climate.

“They [the ESG critics] refuse to acknowledge, in the face of sweltering heat, floods, tornadoes, snowstorms, and other extreme weather, that climate change is real and is a true business threat to all of us,” they wrote in their letter.

Yet critics of ESG see the concept as corporate political indoctrination. Patrick Tyrrell, a research coordinator in The Heritage Foundation’s Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, wrote in 2021 that “ESG advocates force companies to take positions in the political arena on issues that may have nothing to do with the company’s actual business activities … they are signaling is their dereliction of their fiduciary duty to those who have invested in their companies.”

Another outspoken critic of ESG policies, conservative talk-show host Glenn Beck, highlighted some of the latest policy changes at Pepsi in one of his videos.

“They now publish business and sustainability reports,” Beck said. “Remember, this is a glimpse at the future. Their annual report now includes sections such as how much they invest to give back to the community. How much are they investing in women entrepreneurs? What’s their track record on human rights and what is their carbon footprint?”

Michael Bielawski is a reporter for True North. Send him news tips at bielawski82@yahoo.com and follow him on Twitter @TrueNorthMikeB.

Images courtesy of Public domain and Vote for Vermont/Pat McDonald
Spread the love

5 thoughts on “Beth Pearce sides against ‘anti-ESG’ laws, defends left-wing corporate culture

  1. “My first priority is to protect the 49,000 active, vested and retired members of the system, the beneficiaries, and the taxpayers who put dollars into that system.”

    The ‘system’ …. ohh, she means the teachers whose pensions are in the red.
    This ‘good’ woke Democrat gets a failing grade.
    You’d think people would stop electing and supporting Progressive Democrats that so utterly fail them decade after decade. Today John F. Kennedy would be considered a Republican!

  2. Fools and idiots most liberals are.. Imagine you are just diagnosed with a serious brain tumor, or a serious heart condition….both demand immediate surgical procedures. What a shock to you. So what is the FIRST question you have..if you are liberal. ” my brain or heart surgeon ESG and is he Black, Hispanic or minority. I do NOT want Doctors from India or China…they are too smart already. I don’t want a qualified White doctor….I am LIBERAL…I need a Black/Hispanic minority doctor to choose from…and that will make me ….”feel better “…:)….Answer it, Liberal lurkers here. If you choose a white very qualified doctor over a lesser experienced minority ESG one….GUESS WHAT! You are a racist 🙂 It is same thing ….ESG forces places to accept far lesser qualified people of color and discriminates against Whites, Asians and Indians….and in a serious condition operating room THAT what you want? You won’t “feel better” if you re dead 🙂

  3. Im willing to bet she also supports a digitized federal currency….AND if YOUR money is in vanguard, you are helping promote this garbage. There are plenty of investors out there that are not in bed with blackrock and the woke fed. Find one if you care.

  4. I quite an extremely well paying job with an international healthcare company because they supposed ESG. Supporting ESG requires employers to violate employment and civil rights laws. The company I worked for openly discussed no longer hiring people based on their skills, but instead to hire people and create teams based on diversity. Hire diverse employees, not necessarily skilled employees. There were very few white men hired, only woman, of all races. I gave notice as I support equality of opportunity, not Equity. The definition of Equity is equal outcomes, socialism. This is neo-marxistian ideology in praxis. It does not surprise me that the Constitutional Republic of Florida would reject ESG, while the socialist democratic state of Vermont would endorse ESG.

  5. Our state treasurer thinks this ESG is good for our state. Not good for people or business trying secure a loan. This will only lead to the destruction of the state. It is one more tool for the government to control the people.

Comments are closed.