Top Democratic pollsters detail what they think led them to misjudge the 2020 election

By Andrew Trunsky

A group of Democratic Party pollsters acknowledged “major errors” in their 2020 polling in an autopsy-like report discussing how they ended up wrong for the second presidential election in a row.

The firms, ALG Research, GBAO Strategies, Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group, Global Strategy Group and Normington Petts, said that they “failed to live up to expectations” in the joint report, but offered no comprehensive answer as to why they overestimated Democratic margins ahead of Election Day. The groups did, however, offer possible reasons as to why its polling was so inaccurate.

The groups first cited their underestimation of voter turnout, especially among low-propensity voters.

“We found our models consistently overestimated Democratic turnout relative to Republican turnout in a specific way,” the report said. “Among low-propensity voters – people who we expect to vote rarely – the Republican share of the electorate exceeded expectations at four times the rate of the Democratic share.”

The report also said that pollsters could have failed to account for Americans who decided to vote for former President Donald Trump or other Republican candidates at the last minute, though it said it “probably did not play a major role.”

It also cited the pandemic as a possible driver of an unequal rate of response among Democrats and Republicans, since “voters with more progressive attitudes on COVID-19 were not only more likely to wear masks and stay home, but also more likely to answer our poll calls while conservatives remained harder to reach.”

Lastly, the report cited declining trust in social institutions like the government, media and polls altogether, which led to more conservative-leaning voters refusing to participate in surveys as a result. It added that Trump himself may have accelerated the distrust due to his attacks on the media and polls.

“Trump may have helped turn this into a problem for pollsters by attracting distrustful voters and making his most ardent supporters even more distrustful of other people, of the media, and perhaps even polling itself,” the report said. “That, in turn, could have made his supporters less likely to answer polls.”

Despite the firms’ theories, they conceded that they did not have a concrete solution on how to poll accurately.

“How do we get people to participate in polls, if they won’t answer our phones, or respond to surveys online? We don’t have that answer yet,” the report said. “Our industry must figure out how to improve, and it is not going to be easy.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Tom Arthur
Spread the love

One thought on “Top Democratic pollsters detail what they think led them to misjudge the 2020 election

  1. The answer, of course, is just to continue manufacturing more unverifiable votes and accelerate the process! It’s not rocket science and we all know how much you value actual science.

Comments are closed.