This commentary is by Tom Harris, executive Director of the Ottawa-based International Climate Science Coalition – Canada (www.icsc-canada.com).
Last Friday was Earth Day, an event that has been almost entirely hijacked by the climate change movement.
On Earth Day, “climate” appeared 10 times on the earthday.org home page. The first action item on the Greenpeace USA home page was a link to a new climate communications report. The United Nations International Mother Earth Day home page cited “climate” no less than seven times. Pollution was referenced once. Land once. Water and air not at all. Even Friday’s Google home page doodle took you to a page that showed the supposed impact of climate change.
This has been going on for years. Instead of concentrating on issues affecting people today, Earth Day has been taken over by long term concerns about climate change no matter what else is happening in the world. For example, two years ago, UN Climate Chief Patricia Espinosa “urged the international community to remain focused on Earth Day 2020’s overarching theme of climate change, despite the COVID-19 crisis…” The Earth Day 2020 website went further and called, climate change “the biggest challenge to the future of humanity and the life-support systems that make our world habitable.”
But most people in the world apparently do not agree. For the almost 10 million people who voted in the UN’s “My World” poll that was on the web between 2013 and 2020, “Action on climate change” ranked dead last, despite the agency listing that priority first among issues to be selected from.
Such results are inconvenient for UN climate bureaucrats, so, after ending the My World survey, they are essentially running the poll again. This time, they ask the public to tell them: “WHICH SIX OF THE FOLLOWING GLOBAL GOALS ARE OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY?” So far, 582,106 people have voted and “Climate Action” is currently ranked 9th out of the 17 goals, securing about 10% of the votes cast.
When their surveys showed relatively low concern about environmental issues in their 2015 poll, Gallup proposed several causes of the decline, one of which should trouble Earth Day strategists: they are, in effect, focused on the wrong issue. Gallup explained:
The primary focus of the environmental movement has shifted toward long-term threats like global warming — issues about which Americans tend to worry less than about more immediate threats like pollution. Importantly, even as global warming has received greater attention as an environmental problem from politicians and the media in recent years, Americans’ worry about it is no higher now than when Gallup first asked about it in 1989.
Most sensible people are environmentalists and want clean air, land and water. Yet climate change now dominates not just Earth Day, but the entire environmental movement, sucking funding and energies away from tackling important short and mid-term issues such as pollution and species at risk. Besides the strategic blunder of focussing on an issue the general public seems to not really care much about, there is a serious ethical problem that will eventually come back to haunt the movement.
Documents such as the Climate Change Reconsidered series of reports from the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change illustrate that debate rages in the scientific community about the causes of climate change. Scientists cannot yet even agree on whether cooling or warming lies ahead, let alone how much we affect the climate. Yet global warming campaigners assert that “the science is settled.” We know for certain, they claim, that our carbon dioxide emissions will cause a planetary emergency unless we radically change our ways.
This makes no sense, of course. Uncertainty is inherent to all science, especially one as complicated as climate change.
The consequence of this overconfidence is tragic. According to the San Francisco-based Climate Policy Initiative, of the over one-half trillion dollars that is now spent annually across the world on climate finance, 91% goes exclusively to mitigation, trying to control future climate states. Only 7% of global climate finance is dedicated solely to helping vulnerable people cope with climate change in the present. Based on an hypothesis about the causes of climate change, we are letting people suffer today so as to possibly help those yet to be born. As the public come to understand this, they will soon regard the climate crusade as fundamentally immoral and today’s environmental movement misguided.
That scenario, not theoretical future climate, is what should most concern environmentalists who worked on Earth Day this year.
3 thoughts on “Tom Harris: Earth Day obsessed with climate crusade — but the public is not”
Here’s my memory of the very first celebration on Earth Day…..April 22, 1970.
I vividly remember the first Earth Day as a gray rainy day in April 1970 at the Graduate Business School at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst, Mass while looking out the window at the undergraduates and hangers-on, angry and all fired up over the environmental damage being done to the earth.
Lot’s of anger on the part of the kids as they demonstrated the need to protect the environment and save the world…….How did they do this?……..They spray painted university buildings……..Black paint sprayed on building walls, doors and windows…….That was the left’s way of kicking off Earth Day more than 50 years ago to show their commitment to a cleaner environment.
The other thing I remember about the first Earth Day was the UMass administration’s capitulation to the building painting vandals who were feeling stressed out over environmental damage…….The capitulation to the kids was to call off mid-term exams……This included the graduate schools, which was the one thing I was okay with on the first Earth Day.
That’s the first Earth Day I remember and it confirmed me as a conservative.
Anyone else out there who remembers the first Earth Day?
wonderful comment, Peter. I will share it broadly.
I remember it was founded by a homicidal maniac, Ira Einhorn,
who murdered his girl friend and composted the body… great
beginning for the climate hoax which the UN declared that
the growing oceans would sink countries by the year 2000 unless
we started shelling out. Well we’re still here and haven’t lost a
a country yet.
Comments are closed.