Opinion: Young people’s embrace of socialism shows why we shouldn’t lower the voting age

By Jarrett Stepman | The Daily Signal

The left really wants to give kids the right to vote. This idea is so popular on the left that a majority of House Democrats voted in favor of lowering the voting age to 16.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., endorsed the idea as well.

Why would Pelosi and others on the left want to give high school children—hardly known for deep wisdom and sound judgment—a vote?

A new poll perhaps demonstrates why.

The Harris Poll, released exclusively by Axios, shows that roughly half of young Americans say they would prefer living in a socialist country.

It also reveals that many young Americans think the government should provide free health care, education, and medicine, among many other things.

This is very much in line with a poll released in late 2017 by the Victims of Communism Memorial Fund that found similar support for communism among young people, along with widespread ignorance about what communism is.

Most of those surveyed couldn’t define communism or socialism. Many believed, for instance, that President George W. Bush killed more people than Josef Stalin, the ruthless Soviet dictator whose regime murdered tens of millions.

The fact is, socialism attracts widespread support from millennials and members of Generation Z who at the same time are ignorant about socialism.

It’s no wonder that left-wing groups are desperately trying to find ways to get children to vote or be used as useful tools for their agenda, which now appears to include outright socialism.

While young people embrace at least the word “socialism” in disproportionately high numbers, Americans as a whole find the term toxic, as far as who they’d be willing to vote for.

According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, just 25 percent of respondents found “socialist” to be a desirable trait for a presidential candidate. It was among the least-liked traits in the entire poll.

Perhaps America’s older cohorts simply have a better understanding of what socialism is, having lived through the Cold War and faced the existential crisis of the Soviet threat to our country.

Young people, born after the fall of the Berlin Wall, have less of a real-world example to draw on in relation to the evil that socialism creates for a society that adopts it in total.

It’s clear that in the debate over socialism, education is where we have failed. A generation or generations of young Americans are falling under the impression that socialism, whatever they think it is, will bring more prosperity.

History, of course, demonstrates the opposite.

The reason America is so prosperous, and why it remains a place where so many people around the globe aspire to live, is because it rejected these ruthlessly collectivist doctrines.

Our nation held tightly to the ideas of the rule of law, private property, and the Constitution, all of which do far more for the common citizen than the doctrines of socialism, which put absolute power in the hands of a few.

Yet, our education system is failing to transmit those basic ideas to upcoming generations, a failure that this country desperately needs to change if we are to remain a free country.

In a recent survey of how Americans perform on a basic citizenship test, most failed and young people fared by far the worst.

This ties back into the the current debate over voting age.

It’s a good thing that young people participate in politics, develop an instinct for informed citizenship, and take the future of the country seriously.

However, we shouldn’t fetishize youth as itself an advantage, especially when it comes with such a disturbing lack of understanding about history and civics.

The left has a sort of Rousseauian concept of young people as being free from the shackling norms of civilization, as being capable of drawing from wisdom unclouded by the built-up prejudices of experience.

But the demands of citizenship are not fulfilled by mere youthful energy. They require an education in civics, an understanding of our institutions, a certain independence of thought and action.

At the same time progressives demand the lowering of the voting age, we increasingly infantilize young Americans, who are not really seen as “adults” until the age of 26, long after most graduate college.

From smoking to gun ownership, progressives are stripping the rights and life choices of young adults.

Meanwhile, they demand that we put increasing power in the hands of 16-year-olds to determine our leaders and laws.

This has things entirely backward.

Noah Rothman said it best in Commentary magazine:

At a time when society seems inclined to indulge young people’s desire to languish in an extended twilight childhood, it’s revealing that voting is the only adult responsibility for which Democrats think children are prepared. When it comes to just about any other condition of maturity, Democrats seem to think the proper course is the exact opposite.

So lowering the voting age is both reckless in its ethos to put voting power in the hands of people who are not ready for responsible citizenship, yet also is reduced to a mere palliative.

“Democracy” is expanded as liberty recedes, making democratic participation worth little more than a pat on the back.

While this may seem fine for generations raised in the milieu of the “self-esteem” movement, it’s hardly a recipe to strengthen the republic or produce better leaders.

Further lowering the voting age—which at 18 is already quite low—degrades the positives of democracy in America and turns it into the sad caricature of mob rule that the Founders feared.

Let us do more to create responsible adults and citizens rather than perpetually apply “democracy” in places where it is unwarranted.

Image courtesy of Public domain
Spread the love

11 thoughts on “Opinion: Young people’s embrace of socialism shows why we shouldn’t lower the voting age

  1. Taking Socialism 101 is now a requirement for any well rounded student. But I would like to know, how an educational system that doesn’t encourage grading of its students rewards them for their participation if they don’t know how they voted?

    True they can bus them to the polls and program their minds to think a certain way before they actually vote but how will they know a student has been compliant without giving them a grade?

    Perhaps there is something to be said for a passing or failing grade structure or are we just using our youth to rig elections that will eventually overthrow our Republic so it really doesn’t matter if they pass or fail.

  2. Give me a break, If and when these ” KIDS ” are paying in and supporting someone or
    something other then there Smart Phone !!

    Brained washed Liberal Kids, now you really know why Pelosi and the other want to do
    away with the Electoral College, that’s why our founding fathers started it even back then
    they knew large groups could overturn the wishes of others.

    Our Founding Father had great political minds, too bad I cannot say the same for today !!

  3. Perhaps it is time to require high school students to be able to pass the same test that those seeking citizenship are required to pass before graduation.

    • If that were to be the case then government education centers/public funded day care centers would actually have to teach U S history and Civics as subjects.

  4. If someone who is not 21 can’t be trusted with the right of Arms ownership,why in the world is it ok to intrust them with the right to vote.

  5. In my opinion; I could care less how old someone is. If you are 25 or 30 years old and still being claimed as a dependent by someone else than you shouldn’t be able to vote, where as I have no problem with someone voting if they are 14 or 15 years old and no one else can claim you as a dependent.

    But essentially I am against lowering the voting age. What they can’t drink or smoke or fight for their country but they can decide who rules our lives?

    • “I have no problem with someone voting if they are 14 or 15 years old and no one else can claim you as a dependent.”

      How many 14 or 15 year old’s provide their own support? But more importantly, what does being claimed or not as a dependent have to do with the wisdom needed to not vote for democrats?

      • There are more clueless twenty somethings being claimed as dependents than individuals under eighteen taking care of themselves. Those who are under eighteen, living on their own, holding a job and paying bills are showing More responsibility and maturity than the ones who depend on their parents to fix everything.

  6. Funny to watch the leftist drool over this newfound idea of more voters.
    Problem being they can’t help but want to control every aspect of the kiddies
    lives just like they try to do to the adults. I fear the children would be voting
    against those imposing restrictions on them they didn’t want.

    If they get tihe vote do they get to have guns, serve in the military, make financial decisions and sign on their own? Drink? As normal this was a kneejerk decision with out any thought by those who shouldn’t be making decisions..

Comments are closed.