MONTPELIER — The city of Montpelier is considering letting noncitizens vote in local elections by 2020 Town Meeting Day, but city officials say the chances of getting approval by the Vermont Legislature are slim.
The issue was discussed at length at a community meeting in May after foreign nationals with legal residency contacted Montpelier City Clerk John Odum to find out why they can’t vote in local elections.
The question is coming up in cities from Boston to San Francisco, where officials are pushing to let non-U.S. citizens with legal residency have more say in local and citywide elections — but not state or federal elections.
In an interview with True North, Odum said federal law leaves it to the states to decide whether noncitizen voting should be permitted in local elections.
“In Vermont, there is statute that is active that says you have to be a citizen to vote,” he said. “Which means the only way a municipality could allow noncitizens to vote would be to get a charter change.”
According to Odum, noncitizens are ingrained in the Montpelier community and do their fair share to contribute. Some are homeowners and have lived in the city for over a decade, others have sent their kids through the Montpelier school system, yet all are unable to vote on issues like the city budget or City Council elections.
“I think that’s where you get the genuine sort of honest debate — the question of a citizen — can you be a citizen of your community if you’re not a citizen of the country?” Odum said.
While it’s not unconstitutional in the state for a noncitizen to vote, Vermont law makes it illegal. That means the state Legislature would have to approve a charter change to extend voting rights to groups such as visa holders, permanent legal residents, Temporary Protected Status recipients, Deferred Action Childhood Arrival recipients, or other immigrants with permission to be in the country.
“First it would have to pass as a charter change on a city ballot, and then it would go before the Government Operations Committee in the House and the Senate,” Odum said. “Then it would have to be approved by the full legislature.”
At the community meeting in May, Odom and others hosted a teleconference with Doug Chapin, director of the Program for Excellence in Election Administration, at the Hubert H. Humphrey School at the University of Minnesota.
Chapin told the group that Montpelier is free to push ahead with the policy.
“The takeaway that I wanted to give for you all tonight is to highlight that unless you’re running up against a strict prohibition like we see in federal law, communities are free to do what they want with voting qualifications in their own community,” he said.
“There are communities across the country — Takoma Park, Maryland, is one of them — where noncitizens who are lawfully here with permanent residency or other documentation are allowed to vote in local elections, with the argument being that one can be a citizen of a community without being a citizen of the United States. That is a policy decision that the local government, the voters of the local government, that they made.”
Montpelier attorney Dan Richardson, who attended the meeting, said there are four main components laid out in state statute (17 V.S.A. § 2121) that determine voter eligibility: a person must be at least 18 years of age, be a resident of Vermont, take the Voters Oath and be a U.S. citizen.
He added that changing the law won’t be easy.
“The Government Operations Committee has been the burial of many a charter change provision and scrutinizes quite carefully what comes before them,” Richardson said. “It’s not as if that’s a cake walk.”
A few states have allowed municipalities to go ahead with noncitizen voting. In addition to California, Maryland has seen noncitizen voting rights granted in Takoma Park, Mount Rainier, College Park and several smaller towns.
In San Francisco this year, the requirements were boiled down to the standard of being older than the age of 18, legally residing in the city, and also being a parent or guardian of a child under the age of 19 who also resides in the city.
Odum said many ideas were passed around to try and determine how to break down a criteria for noncitizen voting. He said Montpelier officials discussed removing the requirement for citizenship and leaving the requirement of age, legal residency in the town and the Voters Oath.
He said since the meeting he’s received mostly positive feedback about the issue, though some Vermonters were “politely unsure” about the whole thing.
“I’ve gotten a handful of folks who are for it — the only negative feedback I’ve gotten is from folks outside of the city,” Odum said. “I’ve gotten dubious feedback, but probably more positive feedback.”
He said there is not a large number of noncitizens residing in the community.
“I wouldn’t know (how many noncitizens) until they registered on the standalone database that would be created, but I’d have to say we’d be looking at just barely double digits,” Odum said.
Richardson said though it may seem odd to pursue such a challenging feat for less than a dozen people, some residents in the town are supportive and have a willingness to take on these kinds of issues.
According to Odum, there will be a special city meeting that will run concurrent with the general election in November. If noncitizen voting is passed during that time, and the Legislature then approves it, they’re looking at noncitizen voter eligibility by next Town Meeting Day.
Odum said this type of conversation is foreign in Vermont and it’s unknown how it could all turn out, but it is nonetheless compelling.
“Do I think this has a real shot in the legislature? Probably not,” he said. “I’ve certainly advised folks that its chances in the legislature would be very long odds, but theoretically on paper that could be the time frame.”
Briana Bocelli is a freelance reporter for True North Reports.
12 thoughts on “Montpelier considering noncitizen voting, sets Town Meeting Day target”
lols we should be able to vote in the Canadian election to oust nancy boy Trudeau & the Mexican elections to put Trump in as President for USA, Canada & Mexico because by the logic used by Regressive Liberal Montpelier know it alls if non citizens should be able to vote here then we should have votes where they are from!! Worry about limiting the out control Liberal Dem controlled State unions, Lower taxes, the size Govt & people fleeing VT or paving roads pulling common core out of the education system so kids are learning something again instead of getting a Generation of dumbed sheeple who think Socialism is the grandest thing even though facts and history say different!! State & Local authorityies can’t even properly represent Actual American Citizens therefore non citizen voting is the dumbest distraction so far and in away non citizen voting damages as well as weakens the prestige rights and privileges of all Americans not just Vermonters !!
If these idiots have their way, watch out for bus loads of flat landers showing up to contaminate the process. What ever happened to the independent minded Vermonters who would even consider this lunacy?
Just another reason to move from Vermont if approved by the state legislature. Would not surprise me any more if they did.
So the truth comes out. By granting legal status to as many immigrants as possible, through policies like refuge status and DACA, they do indeed plan to fill the voting rolls with people likely to vote for them and their policies which are favorable to the newcomers. Let’s see the Democrats deny those accusation now.
i thought this was satire…as in ‘The Onion’ …not even in Vermont would they do this. They try to outdo themselves..who can ‘outBernie’ the next guy…who can be more outrageous and more socialist than the next guy. We can only shake our heads.Absolutely incredulous. Maybe it is a dream..The Left has the loonies.
NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!
What is wrong with these people–something to do with fluoride in the water? Is non-citizen voting allowed anywhere else in the world?
If non-citizens want to vote, they should become citizens first. Problem solved.
Non-citizens may be enemies, voting to weaken and ruin US, who can then skip town and go back to their homelands.
People pushing this idea belong in the loony bin, or maybe in their graves for treason.
What are they thinking? They aren’t and don’t care about the rights of citizens.
What are these people in Montpelier thinking? I guess it doesn’t mean anything to be a citizen any more.
I’ve never heard of anything so insane. The law is the law, but the commies in Burlington could care less. Why these unqualified clowns should be allowed to vote is beyond me.
Montpelier considering ” Noncitizen ” voting, now I have heard it all !!
What is that they don’t understand about ” NonCitizens “……………
Non-Citizens = No Voting rights, Become a Citizen you’ll have Rights !!!
What other country will let me vote in their elections. Oh, that’s right, many are dictatorships and monarchies. What about the ones that have free elections like Russia ? DON’T CHANGE THE LAW FOR THE WHIMS OF AN ODD BALL CLERK AND A HANDFUL OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.
Please please, citizens only!! Get in the real wide world!
Comments are closed.