Record low unemployment numbers are starting to take a toll on the health of Vermont’s small-business sector, say business and labor experts in the state.
With Vermont’s unemployment rate hovering at a low 2.8 percent, the hiring pool across the state has become increasingly small.
The situation forces businesses to try to attract qualified workers with raised wages and benefits, which can be a challenge for small businesses that work within tight margins. According to Joint Fiscal Office estimates, about 90 percent of employers have staffing of 20 employees or less.
“The low unemployment continues to constrict growth for Vermont businesses,” Betsy Bishop, president of the Vermont Chamber of Commerce told True North.
“Many businesses are reporting increased activity but cannot hire workers to keep up with demand. While we have been seeing this in the retail, service and hospitality industry, we are also seeing it in the advanced manufacturing sector as well,” she said.
Bishop says employers have learned to sweeten offers by proposing increased wages, flextime and benefits tailored to the needs of job applicants.
The problem has gained national attention as well. During a recent CNBC interview, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean said the issue is uniquely challenging for Vermont.
“One of the problems is we’re a small business state, and as you know small businesses always have trouble keeping up with the wages of large corporations,” he said. “And we’re not much of a large corporation state — we have a few big ones, but not very many relative to the mix in some of the larger industrial states.”
Across the country, the situation isn’t much different. The National Federation of Independent Business reports that over a third of its membership — 37 percent — claim to have at least one open position they can’t fill.
The same report finds that 23 percent of small businesses consider the challenge to find qualified staff their No. 1 priority, and 13 percent report recently using temp workers to plug shortages.
In his interview, Dean also highlighted the challenge of getting some Vermonters to join back in the workforce.
“The other issue is there are a fair number of people who could be in the workforce but aren’t,” he said. “Some of them left the workforce a long time ago when economic times were much worse, and they are not coming back in at the rate that we’d like them to.”
He added that various circumstances, such as the high cost of child care, prevent some parents from having the ability to work.
“If it costs you a lot for child care and you have a choice between being in the workforce or not, you may not be able to be in the workforce because you may have to stay at home and take care of your kids,” he said.
Art Woolf, economics professor at the University of Vermont, says he’s noticed many “help wanted” signs around. He also said offering higher wages to lure workers complicates things for employers.
“The classic way to deal with low unemployment is, in order to get people to work you offer a higher wage, and entice people who were not in the labor market to get a job,” he said. “The problem with that is sometimes you have to raise the wages up for all your employees. If you are a grocery store and you need somebody to stock shelves, you can’t just pay the new person $12 an hour when everybody else is making $10 an hour.”
Woolf added it’s not just an issue for low-skilled positions in convenience stores, but also for positions in highly technical industries.
“Even with higher-skilled jobs I think you are finding this similar sort of thing — businesses are having a hard time finding people, and in order to get people they have to do something to sweeten the pot.”
He said the negative impacts on the employer can carry over to the general public in the form of higher costs for products and services.
“It’s a double-edged sword; It’s great for employees, but businesses have to figure out a way to deal with this problem or else they could be less competitive, and ultimately that’s not good for them and it’s not good for their employees either.”
Another point Woolf makes is that high school graduates often aren’t graduating with the skills they need to take positions in manufacturing or technical labor. He said Vermont, like most of the country, is testing around 50-to-60 percent proficiency in key areas such as math and English.
“You have to have a certain level of math basics and a certain level of cognitive understanding, especially if you are dealing with expensive machinery,” he said.
Michael Bielawski is a reporter for True North Reports. Send him news tips at bielawski82@yahoo.com and follow him on Twitter @TrueNorthMikeB.
If a proper work requirement was reinstated to receive welfare payments, food stamps, rent subsidy, or other government checks, there would be plenty of workers lining up for jobs.
No need to pay $10,000 to bring in workers from out-of-state.
No need to bring illegal aliens.
Dean says Vermont is a small business state. Hey Howard, what’s the answer? ? How about Vermont is an unfriendly big business state?
One of the biggest reasons that small businesses in Vermont are struggling to find workers is that this State pays them more money to be on government assistance such as welfare, wick, disability and many other programs that they can snake their way into. Their are many people coming in from other States just to take advantage of Vermont’s subsidies. It’s a joke.
“Another point Woolf makes is that high school graduates often aren’t graduating with the skills they need to take positions in manufacturing or technical labor. He said Vermont, like most of the country, is testing around 50-to-60 percent proficiency in key areas such as math and English.”
Bingo! Last year, 63% of Vermont’s 11th graders were ‘below proficient’ in Math and 67% were below proficient in Science. None the less, about 90% of these kids graduated and only 34% of them graduate from college.
In my business most new applicants aren’t qualified to do the tasks we require and aren’t motivated learn. Other employers I know have the same experience. Many applicants, it seems, apply simply to qualify for one government benefit or another. Others claim disabilities of one kind or another. One young man once told a supervisor he couldn’t work because he’d lose his disability benefits. When asked what his disability was, he said ‘work anxiety’. I kid you not. He said his father had the same disability.
The problem begins with our education system. When students fall behind prescribed grade levels, educators have a propensity to label them as learning disabled (i.e. Special Education). After all, poor academic performance is never the fault of educators and much of the cost to education SPED students is reimbursed to the schools through Federal grants. The disability label often stays with the student into adult life. Now with a burgeoning dysfunctional population of parents and their children the State is ‘doubling down’ and consolidating its dysfunctional education monopoly. Unless this educational governance changes, even with a strong economy, we can expect more of the same.