MONTPELIER, Vt. — High education costs, pre-K administration and marijuana legalization were priority issues for lawmakers in their first week back at the Statehouse for the 2018 legislative session.
On Thursday, the House passed H.511, which if signed by the governor, will eliminate all penalties for personal possession of up to an ounce of marijuana and cultivation of two mature marijuana plants.
At the end of the 2017 legislative session, Gov. Phil Scott vetoed a similar bill, S.22, and the House Republicans blocked an attempt for a veto override vote. At the time Scott said he was still open to legalization, but only if safety measures such as education and roadway provisions were adequately addressed.
During debate on the House floor Thursday, Republican lawmakers, along with Democrat Rep. Cynthia Browning of Arlington, offered no fewer than seven amendments to add public safety features that would ensure highway safety, shield kids from marijuana use of adults, limit the amount of pot that may be stored to 2 pounds, and fund youth anti-smoking drug education, among other things. Democrats and Progressives voted down each attempt to improve public safety by roughly a 6-4 margin.
Road safety continues to be a key concern, as some representatives worry that the current drug recognition experts tasked with identifying drugged driving may not be adequate to identify stoned drivers.
“The press is reporting that there have not been any convictions based off of a DRE,” Rep. Brian Savage, R-Swanton, said to colleagues in a Republican caucus.
Browning called for a provision that requires a tangible highway sobriety test comparable to an alcohol test.
“We have had an increase in the number of law enforcement who are trained as drug recognition experts and that’s all to the good,” she said. “But we don’t have a field test impairment device for cannabis intoxication and impairment the way we do with alcohol. We need that and we don’t have it. … You are not protecting the safety of the traveling public.”
Rep. Francis McFaun, R-Barre Town, got upset that Gov. Scott might approve legislation which lacks key components he asked for back in May. “He said he would never support a bill unless these [education and roadway safety] were in there,” he said.
Scott, in a Dec. 1 interview on VPR’s “Vermont Edition” program , signaled possible support for legalizing personal possession of marijuana.
Another big topic this past week was education spending. The state is facing a 9-cent rise in property taxes due to an education fund shortfall of around $80 million. Rep. Scott Beck, R-St. Johnsbury, pointed out that 6 cents of that 9 cents is owed to increases by school board spending.
During a Republican caucus meeting Wednesday, Rep. Heidi Scheuermann, R-Stowe, criticized the overbearing unfunded mandates by the state.
“Every year we are passing more and more mandates and other things on top of our school districts, including now,” she said. “And this isn’t us — the state Agency [of Education] and the State Board [of Education] have got this ‘proficiency-based learning’ that is changing everything. It’s literally a 180-degree shift in their grading and in everything else that they are doing.”
Beck said education spending by individual districts is spread around in a way that individual communities do not feel the full weight of the decisions they make.
“Right now, when a district decides to spend another dollar, what happens is that district only has to come up with 40 cents,” he said. “The other 60 cents gets pushed onto all the other districts and their taxpayers, and all the other districts are doing that to each other.”
Also last week, members of the Education and Human Services committees in both chambers met to discuss proposed changes to Act 166, which provides 10 hours of preschool education to qualified families.
At the meeting, Agency of Human Services Secretary Al Gobeille and Agency of Education Secretary Rebecca Holcombe discussed a proposal to simplify and streamline the administration process of Act 166. Among their first proposals was to let the Agency of Education take the lead on Act 166 instead of a joint process with Human Services.
“Having dual agencies try to run one program was not working. It’s just too much to expect,” Gobeille said.
In addition, they discussed a goal to have statewide contracts between the preschool providers and the supervisory unions and school districts. Under the current structure, supervisory unions and school districts operate with somewhere between 10 and 50 providers, often with varying contracts and duplicate contracts.
Regarding operational functions and policy, Gobeille called for more uniformity.
“At the end of the day, it’s so confusing for the people who are trying to give us feedback,” he said. “The way this bureaucracy is run people might get frustrated to some degree, but it should not be frustrating to this level.”
Michael Bielawski is a reporter for True North Reports. Send him news tips at email@example.com and follow him on Twitter @TrueNorthMikeB.
4 thoughts on “Education and marijuana top early legislative agenda at Statehouse”
School choice is the answer. Disappointing to see it was even discussed.
What’s really going to get the Progressives and Dems in a hissy is now under the new federal 529 laws you can pay for K-12 education with a 529 and take the state income tax deduction. Even in, God forbid, religious schools.
It’s a step, albeit a small one, in the right direction.
In the meantime, Vermont’s high school parents (grades 7-12) should know that they have the option to send their kids to any public or independent school of their choice (not religious however) and receive the State’s Announced Average Tuition voucher which is currently a bit more than $15,000 per high school student. The only caveat is that their local school board must authorize the tuition voucher.
For grades PK-6, unfortunately, the tuition voucher isn’t available unless the local school district closes its public elementary schools.
One of the problems with Act 46 consolidation is the consolidation of school board membership that comes with it. These school boards are already notoriously stacked with labor union advocates, be they retired teachers, teachers from other districts, government employees or their family members. And while some State conflict of interest statutes are often offended by this kind of membership, rarely are these cases litigated.
At some point voters will realize the absurdity of the anti-school choice lobby, especially when they juxtapose the terms in this True North headline:
– Education and marijuana top early legislative agenda at Statehouse –
Says it all, doesn’t it.
“At some point voters will realize the absurdity of the anti-school choice lobby, especially when they juxtapose the terms in this True North headline:”
For those of you in VT I certainly hope so, but I highly suspect this won’t happen. Just like the repeal of the MA sales tax was voted down in MA recently. Why, because of all the adds on TV and the Radio by the education union spewing “The kids will suffer” . It was shot down in referendum.
Comments are closed.