Customers are paying nearly 100% of Seattle’s new soda tax

By Tim Pearce

Seattle soda drinkers are paying nearly every penny of a tax on sugary drinks that the City Council put in place in January 2018, according to a new study.

University of Washington researchers studied the effects of the soda tax on the prices of taxed and untaxed drinks at various types of stores. The study found that, on average, 97 percent of the 1.75 cents per fluid ounce tax is paid by consumers, according to the January 2019 report.

“We don’t know why, but they did see something similar in Berkeley,” research team leader Jesse Jones-Smith told The Seattle Times, referencing Berkeley, California, which passed a soda tax before Seattle.

Researchers studied drink prices at more than 200 Seattle stores before the tax was enacted and compared them to prices at the same stores six months after the tax went into effect. The researchers also studied prices at 200 stores outside Seattle in surrounding communities to gather a baseline.

Researchers also studied how the tax affected the prices of likely replacement products if people moved away from buying the taxed items.

“The most important finding is that in the large grocery stores most of the tax is being passed through,” Jones-Smith told The Seattle Times.

More of the tax burden was passed on to consumers in small stores than in larger supermarkets. Small stores passed on 104 percent of the tax to consumers, according to the report. Larger stores passed on 86 percent.

Across all stores, 102 percent of the tax was passed on to consumers on soft drinks, 84 percent on sweetened teas and sports drinks, 63 percent on sugar-sweetened juice drinks, and 62 percent on sweetened bottled coffee drinks.

The city implemented the tax to curb residents’ sugary-drink consumption while raising additional funding for city programs. University of Washington researchers are still studying if the tax affected soda consumption.

Seattle collected nearly $17 million more in tax revenue in the first nine months of 2018, and the city is now planning future spending based on that level of revenue, The Seattle Times reports.

Washington voted to ban any new soda taxes in the state in November 2017.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Florian

5 thoughts on “Customers are paying nearly 100% of Seattle’s new soda tax

  1. This is why our law makers are out of control. Nobody pays attention you’all know we have a sugar tax in VT right?

  2. Why don’t they just get rid of all the illegal aliens in the state, save the state millions in welfare, schooling, and other freebies given to these people, and save REAL AMERICANS money?

  3. If the consumers were not burdened with the tax the then the tax would not serve the intended purpose of reducing the consumption of sugar sweetened drinks. As the price differential between sugar sweetened drinks and artificially sweetened ones grows greater, so will the shift toward artificially sweetened ones. However, while the seller can pass the cost of the tax through to the consumer, the seller still bears the revenue loss of demand shift to bootlegged soda and loss of customers to stores outside the taxed area. If I have to drive out of town to get the soda I want, I’ll do the rest of my shopping there also. How much tax revenue does Seattle lose while gaining revenue from the sugar levy?

    • Who cares? I don’t care about their “…intended purpose of reducing the consumption of sugar..”. WHO TF are THEY to impose a tax for MY health? BS! It sure isn’t for my health! They would kill me to know I support Trump. So there goes their theory of caring for their constituents. The idiots here will be pulling the same crap. I’m dusting off my yellow flak jacket.

  4. I’m glad this is in Seattle, I’m not a big soda drinker but if our Progressive DemocRATs see
    this article …………… They’ll want to implement this TAX, Wow more revenue to squander.

    The problem is that it will hurt there base, as their constituents are on the Government Dole !!

Comments are closed.