‘Ambitious’ Biden regulation would ‘force’ most Americans out of gas cars, critics say

By Casey Harper | The Center Square

Will the Biden administration’s latest energy regulations force Americans out of gas vehicles and into more expensive electric cars? Lawmakers in the U.S. House held a hearing Wednesday tackling that key question.

The hearing, held by the Oversight Committee’s Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs Subcommittee, focused on newly proposed Environmental Protection Agency tailpipe emission rules that the federal agency itself called “ambitious.”

Michael Bielawski/TNR

“The EPA defines EVs as zero-emission vehicles. However, EVs are not truly zero-emission vehicles,” Josh Roe, CEO of the Kansas Corn Growers Association, said during his testimony. “While they do not have a tailpipe, you still need to account for the emissions that come from the power grid. The U.S. power grid is currently 60% powered by coal and natural gas.”

The EPA projects the proposed regulation would mean that fully electric vehicles make up two thirds of all new “light duty” and 46% of new medium-duty vehicle sales by 2032.

The EPA, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment, said in a news release that the rules would improve air quality and would avoid “nearly 10 billion tons of CO2 emissions.” The rule changes still faces a lengthy public comment and approval process as well as avoiding an override from Congress after it is implemented.

“By proposing the most ambitious pollution standards ever for cars and trucks, we are delivering on the Biden-Harris Administration’s promise to protect people and the planet, securing critical reductions in dangerous air and climate pollution and ensuring significant economic benefits like lower fuel and maintenance costs for families,” EPA Administrator Michael Regan said.

The rule proposal was a focal point of scrutiny from Republicans during the hearing Wednesday.

“The rules would require an incredibly rapid EV transition that industry, the grid, and consumer demand cannot keep pace with,” U.S. Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, who chairs the subcommittee, said during the hearing. “Further, the critical mineral supply chain is already under stress. Does EPA even know whether there is enough raw material to meet its proposed standards?”

Fallon pointed out he does not oppose electric vehicles, only the federal effort to rapidly replace gas vehicles with them via government regulation. He also said EPA officials were invited to testify but declined.

“We hope this hearing will sound an alarm about the costs these two rules would inflict on American consumers, American manufacturers, the American economy, and American national security,” Fallon said.

Some witnesses pushed back against the EPA’s claims and poked holes in the assumptions about electric vehicles.

“The EPA defines EVs as zero-emission vehicles. However, EVs are not truly zero-emission vehicles,” Josh Roe, CEO of the Kansas Corn Growers Association, said during his testimony. “While they do not have a tailpipe, you still need to account for the emissions that come from the power grid. The U.S. power grid is currently 60% powered by coal and natural gas. Current and proposed EPA rules do not account for these upstream emissions when calculating compliance, let alone the additional emissions and toxic pollution generated by mining rare earth minerals around the world.”

Roe pointed to the added cost for Americans, especially farmers and those in rural areas.

“EVs are $10,000-25,000 more expensive than comparable internal combustion engine vehicles, placing them out of reach for many consumers including those in rural America where median incomes are lower than that of urban areas,” he said.

Critics say the new rule is the latest in what they call the Biden administration’s sustained war on American energy and fossil fuel companies. They point to Biden’s discouragement of pipeline investment and oil permitting while simultaneously calling on other nations to produce more oil.

“The administration is on a whole-of-government mission to address climate change, no matter the law or the choices of consumers,” Kathleen Sgamma, president of the Western Energy Alliance, told The Center Square, adding that the rule changes would “force everyone into electric vehicles.”

The Biden administration is standing by the rules, one of several changes to implement a more progressive, green agenda at the federal level.

“These ambitious standards are readily achievable thanks to President Biden’s Investing in America agenda, which is already driving historic progress to build more American-made electric cars and secure America’s global competitiveness,” Regan said.

Images courtesy of Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development and Michael Bielawski/TNR

5 thoughts on “‘Ambitious’ Biden regulation would ‘force’ most Americans out of gas cars, critics say

  1. The 2024 elections will put all of these ambitious climate change fairy tales into the toilet where they belong.

  2. Wishful thinking, eventually people will wake up, and show it’s all smoke & mirrors,
    just look at the ” lifestyle ” of the global crusaders promoting their global nonsense
    what a pack of hypocrites !!

    If they really want to curtail ” Co2 ” they would be dealing with the real culprits, and
    it’s not the US and especially not Vermont………… fools in charge, for an agenda.

    Lithium battery production or disposal, that’s rarely in any discussion, so where’s that
    trash going ???

  3. The EPA needs to be dissolved as it’s not a elected agency and should have no power. Potato head biden needs to have his check book taken away so he can do no more harm to the economy he’s (his puppet string pullers) already crashed into the pits. Anyone wanting a truck to pull thing with is not going to buy worthless EV truck who’s battery will need recharge after 75-100 miles. This stupid biden policy must be the blueprint for failure our leftist commies use for their brain dead idea’s that fail due to reality.

  4. They have no intention of it actually being a successful or even useful change. In fact, they know for certain with the next change of administration it will be done away with, but by that time, they’ll have given trillions of fiat dollars to their friends and cronies and of course to themselves through shell corporations and let’s not forget subsidies, to “build the infrastructure”, which they also know will quickly fill a landfill. But who cares, it will be paid for already and they’ll be walking away with the cash.
    Just like the solar farms and the windmills, they couldn’t care less if it actually works, just that they get to pay themselves and their friends to “make it happen”.Later there’ll be another bonanza of subsidies to clean up the mess and the dumps.

Comments are closed.