ACLU, VPIRG ‘police reform’ plan: end immunity, cut funding, eliminate school resource officers

The House Committees on Judiciary and Government Operations held a public hearing Thursday on proposed changes to law enforcement in Vermont.

By Guy Page

The House Committees on Judiciary and Government Operations on Thursday held the first of its three virtual Public Hearings on Police Reform. From these hearings may well flow new legislation cracking down on the rights, effectiveness, and funding of Vermont police.

In anticipation of these hearings, the Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG), Justice for All, the ACLU of Vermont, and several other lobby groups published 10 police-control recommendations in a document entitled “Re-imagining Policing in Vermont.”

Policing in Vermont isn’t perfect. Injustice happens. When it does, citizen advocates and the Legislature respond with plans to ensure that all people are treated justly. At least eight of the 10 “re-imagining” recommendations merit close scrutiny before becoming law. For example:

End qualified immunity. Vermont law shields officials who abuse their power from meaningful accountability. State lawmakers need to disincentivize police misconduct.

In other words, “you-bust-me-I-sue-you.” Police now receive qualified immunity, defined as “immunity from civil suits unless the plaintiff shows that the official violated ‘clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known’.” Without it, virtually any arrest or even intervention could and likely would result in a civil suit, aided and abetted by ‘victims’ rights’ groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and Vermont Legal Aid. And, legislation ending QI would no doubt include expanded government funding for ‘victims rights’ groups to help citizens file their suits.

Eliminating immunity for police might also seem hypocritical coming from a Legislature whose absolute “sovereign” immunity is already enshrined in the Vermont Constitution. Article 14 says “The freedom of deliberation, speech, and debate, in the Legislature, is so essential to the rights of the people, that it cannot be the foundation of any accusation or prosecution, action or complaint, in any other court or place whatsoever.” Likewise do Vermont municipalities enjoy sovereign immunity, according to the Vermont League of Cities and Towns: “Sovereign immunity protects governments from liability (legal responsibility) from unlawful acts. (e.g., negligence, trespass, nuisance, etc.). Even though municipalities are not sovereign entities, sovereign immunity extends to them due to their status as political subdivisions of the state.”

Remove police from schools. The presence of “school resource officers” (SROs) disproportionately harms students of color, students with disabilities, and low-income students. We must end the use of police in schools and invest in educational support services.

Two years ago, when a pandemic of active shootings was infecting American schools, a near-miss in New Haven led the Vermont Legislature to enact gun control because the safety of students trumped all. If VPIRG/ACLU etc. get their way, there will be no Glock-toting sheepdog on duty to protect the sheep – including those of color – when the wolf with the semi-auto slips past the front door. And if not a nearby resource officer, who will stop the next angry man-child from assaulting a fellow student? His teacher?

Limit police involvement in low-level offenses. We must prevent unnecessary police interactions which disproportionately impact people of color. That includes limiting police involvement in mental health crises, authority to conduct “consent”-based searches, and discretion to cite or arrest for petty offenses like “disorderly conduct.”

“Petty offenses” like – what? It doesn’t say. Shoplifting? Aggressive, threatening pandhandling? Public intoxication? Trespassing and property damage? VPIRG and the ACLU may want to live in a Vermont where the police don’t respond to calls by frightened citizens enduring threats or actual “petty” violence and robbery. But most Vermonters have seen the footage from “low-level legal” jurisdictions like San Francisco – and they don’t want that here.

Ban police use of military-grade equipment and techniques. Police militarization is unnecessary and dangerous. Giving police military equipment encourages the use of paramilitary tactics with civilians, including no-knock raids, as well as abusive “crowd control techniques,” such as use of pepper spray, rubber bullets, tear gas, and sound canons [sic].

Without crowd control, how will police respond if organized rioters like Antifa or Black Lives Matter decide to riot en masse in Vermont, as is happening now in cities on the Woke West Coast? Perhaps even more worrisome, how will Vermont’s extremely well-armed citizenry respond when they realize the police can’t protect them? The Legislature will answer these questions fully and forthrightly – unless of course it is amenable to anarchy and lawlessness, as are elected leaders in Seattle and Portland.

Require appointment of independent counsel outside of State’s Attorneys and the Attorney General’s office to review and prosecute police misconduct.

Independent counsel are often redundant and always expensive. Many Vermonters elect and expect officials to uphold the Constitution even when it’s uncomfortable to do so, not to have them fob off the job to an unelected appointee.

Increase transparency so that police misconduct cannot be concealed. That includes ending confidentiality for officer disciplinary records and other limits on public access to information.

As with “qualified immunity,” this request of “transparency” is another “do as I say, not as I do” singling-out of police. When the records of the Vermont Attorney General, the governor, and the Legislature are fully open to public review – and by design, they’re not – lawmakers could fairly and openly have this discussion.

Establish community control and authority over law enforcement, including over police priorities, transparency, and discipline, and end collective bargaining agreement provisions that limit oversight and accountability.

The end of collective bargaining would make Vermont a union-busting state. Which it’s not – as demonstrated by the teachers’ union stranglehold on school funding, and the state employee union’s powerful influence on state spending.

Some in the media dispute the cop-teacher union comparison because ‘a teacher has never shot a student.’

Sure – but when was the last time a person of color was killed by a Vermont police officer? On a recent Google search of Vermont murder victims, Vermont Daily went back about three years and found precisely none. We did, however, find several shootings of black men by other black men, including some that were drug-trafficking related and presumably could have been avoided by more effective policing. Passing a law to stop Vermont police from killing black people is a solution in search of a problem. In fact it would allow a progressive government to repopulate police forces with its own.

Also, when union-protected public school teachers practice and preach intolerance for questioning the Black Lives Matter movement and other progressive ‘sacred cows,’ they do harm their students. Freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and rational discourse used to be the hallmark of American public schools. A citizenry without them cannot maintain a free republic. Squelching unpopular thought in the classroom should concern anyone who professes to care about minority rights.

And finally, and predictably, VPIRG/ACLU et. al. want to defund the police.

INVEST in communities, not policing. It is time to demand that our laws and our investments match our values as Vermonters, and to affirm that Black Lives Matter. Local and state policymakers must prioritize people and communities, not policing and prisons.

Recently Vermont officials were horrified to learn that many inmates held out-of-state have been infected with Covid-19. Gov. Scott suggested the Legislature revisit his suggestion to build a new prison to replace today’s inadequate facilities. The “decarceration” movement considers building new prisons a non-starter. Progressive lawmakers instead would empty and close our prisons and replace them with some kind of mental health system.

In 1787, a Philadelphia mover and shaker named Elizabeth Willing Powel asked Ben Franklin if the Constitutional Convention would produce a republic or a monarchy. Franklin famously replied, “a republic, if we can keep it.” At tomorrow’s public hearing, and with the ballot next week and in November, Vermonters of all opinions have this opportunity.

Read more of Guy Page’s reports. Vermont Daily is sponsored by True North Media.

Image courtesy of Brattleboro Police Department
Spread the love

6 thoughts on “ACLU, VPIRG ‘police reform’ plan: end immunity, cut funding, eliminate school resource officers

  1. The next time a cute young lady or a handsome young man shows up at your door asking for a donation to VPIRG tell them nicely that you are not interested in their work. VPIRG is another nonprofit group of unelected, ideological, progressive issue driven people who use Vermont as their control petri dish. True North should assemble a list of all Vermont nonprofits that affect our daily lives. Most all of these groups work against individual freedoms and pay little attention to the Vermont Constitution.

    With a raging drug epidemic going on in Vermont killing young and older adults and children, VPIRG wants to handcuff the police by creating racial issues that do not exist. If blacks from other states are here to deliver poison for drug profits they should be profiled and arrested then jailed. These drug mules also carry illegal weapons and are dangerous people. I don’t care what color they are if they deliver poison from the cities to kill and destroy our youth they need to be stopped by the police.

    These nonprofits also pay substantial salaries to their employees and are self perpetuating drains on freedom. They are heavily supported by legislators who wish to pass the buck on responsibility and blame so the voters will not remove them from office. This year, think long and hard about your voting preference. I’m old enough to remember the real Vermont before the flatlander invasion into our politics and institutions. Live Free or Die is looking very appealing or you can TAKE BACK VERMONT, by voting these people out of office.

    • PS, If you think your representative or senator isn’t the problem think again. If there;s a D or P following their name you can be sure they are the problem. The same goes for our Democratic governor who claims to be a republican.

  2. While these objectives are stupid enough, the rationale justifying them is even dumber. Who thinks up these ideas????? They must be from Mars, but on second thought, I don’t wanr to disparage the folks from Mars. It’s anyone’s guess to the answer to that one.

  3. Wonder why the dramatic spike in gun sales? Be prepared to protect yourself. Expect an increase in drug related activities, especially in the schools.

    Ask why police personnel records should be open, but not the teachers records. Take resource officer out of the school and lose a potential advocate for a child in trouble. A dedicated SRO will get to know the kids and be able to provide support and guidance, especially if teachers are willing to work with them.

  4. Jump on the bandwagon, ACLU, VPIRG “‘police reform ” plan that would
    end immunity, cut funding, ” eliminate” school resource officers, now that’s
    leading edge………..

    Yeah, this gaggle of fools, know it alls, that no nothing !! just spewing the liberal
    agenda, trust these clowns, no thanks they don’t want reform they just want to
    ” dismantle ” policing, why don’t they just say it …………

    Are there personal in the police departments that shouldn’t be there ” Yes ”
    and are there personal within the ACLU, VPIRG that shouldn’t be there, and
    that’s another ” yes ” ….they lost their mission purpose !!

    So, agenda driven political decisions, or common sense …..

Comments are closed.