By Michael Bastasch
It’s been repeated throughout the media — future global warming could wipe-out one-tenth of the U.S. economy by 2100. It’s a top line finding of a major government climate report, but it’s based on a study funded by groups affiliated with two major Democratic donors.
The oft-repeated claim also stemmed from a global warming projection that’s come under increased scrutiny from experts, including one who called it “outlandish.”
The federal government released the second volume of the National Climate Assessment (NCA) Friday. The federal report issued dire warnings, including from “ice sheet disintegration on accelerated sea level rise, leading to widespread effects on coastal development lasting thousands of years.”
The report also claims that “global greenhouse gas emissions is expected to cause substantial net damage to the U.S. economy throughout this century,” including a 10 percent hit to gross domestic product (GDP) in one extreme scenario.
However, NCA’s dire prediction of a 10 percent hit to U.S. GDP comes from a 2017 study supported by the charitable foundations founded by major Democratic donors. The study was also funded by other organizations, including the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Skoll Global Threats Fund.
That 2017 study, published in the journal Science, was funded in part by Bloomberg Philanthropies and Next Generation, which were founded by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and San Francisco billionaire Tom Steyer, respectively.
University of Colorado professor Roger Pielke, Jr. pointed out problems with the study on Twitter Saturday, including the fact it was funded by groups connected with Bloomberg and Steyer.
2/2 Shouldn’t such an outlandish, outlier conclusion been caught in the review process?
Not a good look that sole review editor for this chapter is an alum of the Center for American Progress … which is funded by Tom Steyer.
Even rudimentary attention to COI would avoided this.
— Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) November 24, 2018
Bloomberg and Steyer were the biggest donors to Democratic-aligned political action groups in the 2016 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP).
Bloomberg, who founded Bloomberg Philanthropies, handed nearly $60 million to liberal SuperPACs to help put Democratic candidates in office and defeat Republicans in the 2018 election cycle, according to the CRP.
Steyer, who co-founded Next Generation, gave roughly $58.7 million to liberal SuperPACs, according to CRP. Bloomberg and Steyer back the Paris climate accord and Obama-era policies to phase out fossil fuels.
The Bloomberg-Steyer-funded study found future temperature rise could cost “roughly 1.2% of gross domestic product per [additional one degree Celsius increase] on average.” At the most extreme high-end, that could add up to 10 percent of GDP by 2100.
Pielke called the use of such an extreme scenario “embarrassing” because it’s based on a future that’s 15 degrees Fahrenheit warmer — in other words, twice what the United Nations’ most extreme scenario projects.
But even the United Nations’ worst-case scenario, called RCP8.5, is being called into question by experts. A study published in 2017 found RCP8.5 was “exceptionally unlikely” because it suffered from “systematic errors in fossil production outlooks.”
“Imagine if research funded by Exxon was sole basis for claims. Given weaknesses of the work [it’s] just [foolish] to lean on it so much,” Pielke tweeted.
Major media outlets’ however, did no such examination of the NCA’s reliance on such an “outlandish” claim, as Pielke called it.
CNN reported “the economy could lose hundreds of billions of dollars — or, in the worst-case scenario, more than 10% of its GDP” by 2100. The news outlets’ headline warned future warming could also “kill thousands.”
“All told, the report says, climate change could slash up to a tenth of gross domestic product by 2100, more than double the losses of the Great Recession a decade ago,” The New York Times reported of the NCA.
Andrew Light, a distinguished senior fellow at the World Resources Institute and reviewer of the chapter highlighting the Bloomberg-Steyer-funded study did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
Instead, Light forwarded TheDCNF’s request to the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), which is responsible for producing the NCA. USGCRP has yet to respond to TheDCNF’s request.
The NCA was put together with input from 13 federal agencies and outside scientists.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email email@example.com.
5 thoughts on “A top claim in newest US climate report relies on research tied to major Democratic donors”
Want to know the science involved which proves that the left’s Global Warming claims are lies, which proves that climate change is NOT man made, so you’ll know when you’re being lied to ??
I love Dr. Gregory Wrightstone’s relatively short paperback book
“Inconvenient Facts: The science that Al Gore doesn’t want you to know”
Dr. Wrightstone is a geologist, so he does present real science, but he makes it readable and understandable for the non-scientist layman. Most importantly, he gives perspective !!
People ask “Do you believe in climate change”?
Ridiculous Question. If there was no climate change, why would there be the weather report?
Without climate change the weather report would always be exactly the same.
With perspective, one understands the world’s climate change patterns over time, some time frames are long term, some geologic phases are very long term. We’ve had 4 Ice Ages over the millenia.
During these (the “little ice age” ran from 1290-1850) CO2 levels go down with death, disease and starvation. Higher CO2 levels come with plentiful harvests and healthy populations. We’ve had way higher CO2 levels historically than we have now. Way higher !! Plants love it and grow abundantly!
Get this book and learn.
Another Bloomberg hyping job to boost his Renewable Energy Financial Services business.
It is similar to Blittersdorf boosting his wind business by hyping RE via VPIRG
This fake news climate report is grossly over the top.
Bloomberg got embarrassingly more than he bargained for, i.e., egg on his face, tomatoes are next.
Anyone of even average intelligence knows that “man-made climate change” is a hoax and a fraud. Nothing more than a left wing moonbat scheme to give government more power over us by stealing our money and redistributing it to democrat voters. Truly pathetic how so many otherwise sober people have signed on to this silly religion.
Follow the money trail. These two left wing loons are getting their money’s worth. They have paid plenty to have their ‘hypothesis’ proven.
The study claims that global warming could wipe out a tenth of the U.S. economy by 2100. I see no mention of their analysis of the percentage of the U.S. economy that the actions they propose would wipe out, and it is beyond question that the inefficiency of the programs they encourage would have a severe economic impact, would even choke the socioeconomic advance of third world countries. Recent studies indicate that the wind turbine generators they have enthusiastically subsidized may, in fact, increase global warming – the consequences of having plunged into “solutions” for a problem they do not fully comprehend.
Comments are closed.