The following information is from Health Choice VT, an advocacy group dedicated to protecting freedom of choice in personal medical decisions.
In November 2021, attorney Aaron Siri explained to an expert panel at Congress that his firm was seeing “an avalanche of submissions” from people seeking help to sue after covid vaccine-injuries.
Here we are in early January 2022, and:
- The CDC’s data released December 31, 2021 contains 1,017,001 covid vaccine-injury records.
- The WHO’s global database (VigiAccess) has collected 2,933,902 covid vaccine-injury records.
Even young children are being vaccine-injured.
From CDC’s own publication, MMWR Dec. 31, 2021:
- “5,277 VAERS reports received for children aged 5–11 years” [1,028 (19.5%) were excluded from this analysis]
- “Approximately 5.1% of parents reported that their child was unable to perform normal daily activities on the day after receipt of dose 1, and 7.4% after receipt of dose 2. Approximately 1% of parents reported seeking medical care in the week after vaccination”
- “Two reports of death during the analytic period [November 3 – December 19, 2021].”
Any vaccine should only be given after prior, free and fully informed consent. Japan has adopted a common sense policy that respects human rights. Check it out: “Japan’s Vaccination Policy: No Force, No Discrimination”
If the Products Do Not Prevent Infection, Why the Mandates?
United States CDC Director Walensky: “What [the vaccine] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”
National Health Institute for Health Researchers: “Fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts.” (Lancet)
39 Studies on Vaccine Efficacy that Raise Doubts on Vaccine Mandates
by Paul Elia Alexander PhD
1) Gazit et al. out of Israel showed that “SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13-fold (95% CI, 8-21) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected.” When adjusting for the time of disease/vaccine, there was a 27-fold increased risk (95% CI, 13-57).
2) Ignoring the risk of infection, given that someone was infected, Acharya et al. found “no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta.”
3) Riemersma et al. found “no difference in viral loads when comparing unvaccinated individuals to those who have vaccine “breakthrough” infections. Furthermore, individuals with vaccine breakthrough infections frequently test positive with viral loads consistent with the ability to shed infectious viruses.” Results indicate that “if vaccinated individuals become infected with the delta variant, they may be sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others.” They reported “low Ct values (<25) in 212 of 310 fully vaccinated (68%) and 246 of 389 (63%) unvaccinated individuals. Testing a subset of these low-Ct samples revealed infectious SARS-CoV-2 in 15 of 17 specimens (88%) from unvaccinated individuals and 37 of 39 (95%) from vaccinated people.” (read more)
Read the full article.
The short story is that, based on the number of VAERS reports relative to any other vaccine in history, there is no justification for vaccine mandates and much reason to believe that (at least for certain cohorts) there is more harm than good that may result from them. See one example here on how vaccines more likely to cause myocarditis in men under 40 than getting COVID:
https://vinayprasadmdmph.substack.com/p/uk-now-reports-myocarditis-stratified
Vaccines do not prevent infection or spread, and have only been shown to TEMPORARILY reduce the severity of symptoms. Even then, the data do not suggest you can boost indefinitely to any benefit. That’s my take.
Would somebody please translate this “whatever it is” into plain English? And it also would be helpful for the author to recognize that most of us are neither attorneys nor physicians.