By Eric Lieberman
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Michael O’Rielly said Monday that some supporters of so-called “net neutrality” rules have essentially been “brainwashed.”
“There was a lot of misinformation on the substance” of the FCC’s recent repeal of the 2015 Open Internet Order, which effectively classified the internet as a Title II utility, according to O’Rielly, speaking at a media briefing. “People were relaying wrong information,” and there were at least “15 different definitions” for what net neutrality is, said O’Rielly.
When asked if he thought Republicans such as himself and FCC Chairman Ajit Pai could have done more to change the tenor of the debate, O’Rielly said it was people on the other side that should be mostly to blame.
Net neutrality supporters “were late to the game with quelling hatred and violent rhetoric,” said O’Rielly, who added that he believes in the right of protesters to publicly express their opinions.
The debate over the newly imposed internet regulations reached a pinnacle of acerbity and intensity in the months heading up to the FCC’s decision.
Certain net neutrality activists and supporters constantly launched extremely vile and racist attacks against Pai. There was also a security scare during Pai’s public speech detailing the end of net neutrality — a bomb threat was called in, and the room was forced to evacuate.
The threats became so pervasive that Pai felt forced to cancel an appearance at a popular tech conference he often attended without fear.
O’Rielly said that in his many years in Washington D.C., the fervor surrounding this issue — which is being re-stoked — is just as impassioned, if not more, then past situations related to wars or government shutdowns.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
Thanks for this statement from the FCC; but I agree that the article is missing some critical information. This was a great opportunity to characterize “net neutrality”, why it is being dropped by the FCC, and what protesters are worked up about.
OK, I get it, there’s a brainwashing going about. This piece is missing valid discussion points and contains only the hyperbole surrounding the argument for or against “net neutrality”. Please complete your article.
10 years ago before his FCC days Mr O Reilly made a huge point that consumers could speak for themselves in their net neutrality concerns. When they did in overwhelming numbers he now says their brainwashed. In that same panel discussion he said that he was satisfied that communication issues are all best settled “inside the Beltway” and the States should stay out of the way, somebody here has been brainwashed. Maybe him! I was also on that panel.