By Jason Hopkins
A recently released study suggests those less concerned with climate change practice more eco-friendly habits than those who are more alarmed about the issue.
In an April study published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, University of Michigan psychology graduate student Michael Hall researched the behavioral differences between people who hold varying degrees of concern toward climate change. Hall, over the course of one year, examined 600 different Americans who “regularly reported their climate change beliefs, pro-environmental behavior, and other climate-change related measures.”
The report divided subjects into three groups: “Highly Concerned,” “Cautiously Worried” and “Skeptical.” Additionally, the report measured how frequently subjects participated in “green” behavior: using public transportation, purchasing environmentally friendly products, using reusable shopping bags, and recycling.
Unsurprisingly, Americans in the “skeptical” category were most opposed to enacting government regulations to address climate change. Those in the “Highly Concerned” category were much more in favor of government intervention. A surprising find in the study, however, was these same skeptics were “most likely to report engaging in individual-level pro-environmental behaviors.” Hall and his colleagues found these behaviors to be consistent throughout the year.
While it is difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons for someone to be strongly supportive of environmental regulations but not live a more environmentally friendly lifestyle, the phenomenon known as moral licensing is likely a factor. People will typically engage in “bad” behavior if they feel they have earned their good graces with another action. In regard to Hollywood actors and progressive politicians, the hypocritical lifestyles of climate alarmists have been well documented.
Famous climate alarmist Al Gore visited Washington, D.C., on April 24 to tell reporters oil companies should be investigated for polluting the world — he promptly left the event in a gas-powered Lincoln sedan. New York Democratic candidate for Congress Gareth Rhodes has made the environment a focal point of his campaign this election season — doing so while traversing his district in a 1999 Ford Winnebago. Hollywood millionaire Leonardo DiCaprio is able to attend climate change protests when he isn’t flying in personal jets or partying on 470-foot yachts.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
“I’ve paid my carbon credits” they’ll say like rich Medieval penitents who’ve paid their tithes in the ancient Catholic Church, stepping out the cathedral door to wade through the human misery all around them they eagerly add to.
It’s a religion. Don’t expect it to be rational. Privation shall not be imposed upon the elite. Particularly when they are putting So much effort into forcing reduction of Your carbon footprint. You may see the contradiction in millionaire Socialists but they don’t. Wealth is the reward for successfully making everyone else “equal.” Like it or not. Feudalism and slavery permitted the controlling powers to take the product of the workers, gain power and wealth from their labors and return to them only what they found necessary. Doesn’t differ much from Socialism. Castro and Maduro don’t feel compelled to live in starving penury, do they?