McClaughry: Sen. Alison Clarkson’s pension report

By John McClaughry

I’m a believer in legislative bodies making reports to the citizens of what they have wrought in their just completed session. But last month’s report from Senate Majority Leader Alison Clarkson, D-Windsor,  struck me, in at least one important aspect, as indefensibly inflating two minuscule accomplishments.

state of Vermont

Sen. Alison Clarkson, D-Windsor

Sen. Clarkson tells us the Legislature acted to address what she rightly called “a critically important issue, the sustainability of our pension system.” That’s the teachers’ and state employees’ retirement systems, together now $5.6 billion dollars out of balance, which I constantly pointed out was unsustainable when I was a senator 30 years ago.

The treasurer and the Senate Government Operations Committee did attempt to tackle this large problem this year, only to face angry shouts of “betrayal” from the State Employees’ and VT-NEA teachers’ unions.

So what came out of it? Sen. Clarkson tells us the Legislature changed the renamed pension management commission to have nine members instead of seven, and it created a 13-member group (five of them legislators) titled the Pension Benefits, Design, and Funding Task Force, assigned to report to the 2022 session.

There’s nothing wrong with that, but note this: the Democratic legislature utterly failed to approve any actual step to reduce that $5.6 billion unfunded pension fund liability. Rejiggering the pension commission and creating another task force is kicking the ever-larger can — now the size of a bulk tank — further down the road.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute. Reprinted with permission from the Ethan Allen Institute Blog.

Images courtesy of Public domain and state of Vermont

3 thoughts on “McClaughry: Sen. Alison Clarkson’s pension report

  1. Thanks for the update Mr. McClaughry.
    I seem to remember Governor Dean being the one to first shortchange the needed pension fund contributions in order to find the money for his Dr. Dinosaur program. Is that right? A few decades ago and not sure if I remember that correctly. If so a sad lesson on not be willing to be upfront with people to pay for what we want and then robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Comments are closed.